[evlatests] PDif issues at L-band
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Wed May 8 16:01:25 EDT 2013
I'm carefully reviewing the switched power data from the flux
densities run. For most bands, the switched power data are of excellent
quality, although the seven-or-so correlator restarts make
interpretation 'interesting'...
Some extraordinary events are found -- these will be summarized once
I get through all the data.
At L-band, there are a few issues ready for distribution:
1) The PDif values are zero (within the noise) of ea23C (only), and
ea25C and D. I'm puzzled as to how a single IF can have zero PDif -- I
would have expected that ea23D should also be zero, but the data are
fine. In all cases, the PSum values are fine.
2) Something is not right with ea19, on all four IFs. The system
temperature is reported to be between 70 and 150 K, and the PDif values
are weak (expected, due to high Tsys), and of very poor quality. Poor
quality means: the noisy spread in the data are nearly 50% of the mean
value -- this is far higher than expected just from thermal noise.
3) At L-band, most of the expected troubles when the system restarts
-- due to insufficient time on any source to 'remember' the new gain
setting -- should not be present: The antenna slews between sources
were always done at L-band, so the requisite 40 seconds or so will
nearly always be met. And the data show this, as the PDif data
following each of the seven computer restarts were (almost) always
stable (until the next crash). However, things are not all good:
3-a) The 'new' power levels in most cases were within 1 or 2 dB
of the old. This is probably reasonable given changing spillover power
and the effects of RFI within the 1 GHz-wide band. (I'm only reviewing
PDif data within RFI-free subbands). But in some cases the new values
were very different than the old ones. In the worst case (ea12A), at
least a factor of 32! (In this case, the new power level is that much
higher than the old, suggesting probably that *all* the attenuation was
taken out. Buy why would that be? No other antenna (including the
other IFs of ea12) did this. In some cases, the change after the
correlator restart was 3 dB -- rather larger than I think it should be.
4) A truly extraordinary event occurred near 13h (local time), when
the power levels of six antennas dropped by typically 3 to 6 dB, and
stayed low until the next correlator restart (over an hour). The
characteristics are unique:
a) Only six antennas were affected: ea08, ea11, ea14, ea15, ea16,
and ea27.
b) All four IFs were affected, but not equally: the drop for A
and B are the same in ratio. Also the drop for C and D -- but the RCP
drop is very different than the LCP. Some of the drops are extremely
large -- over a factor of 100 for ea16 (on all four IFs) at ea27 (in LCP).
c) The time at which the drop occurred was different for different
antennas. The time(s) at which this occurred are not connected to
the corrrelator troubles -- this drop occurred on its own, for other
reasons.
d) Although I haven't gone through all the other bands, I have
noted that at least some of the other bands showed a similar drop at the
same time.
e) These represent a real gain change -- both PSum and PDif show
the effect (i.e., the reported Tsys is unaffected, except for those
antennas where the drop was very large -- clearly we're in a non-linear
range).
More information about the evlatests
mailing list