[evlatests] PDif compression -- more tests
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Tue Mar 5 12:02:00 EST 2013
Not that I can recall. But ... this mechanism would affect the
old-style X-band receivers equally as the new. Yet we have clear
evidence the old-style (VLA) receivers showed very little compression,
while the new ones are as affected as the other bands ...
But a test should be done.
Ken Sowinski wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Rick Perley wrote:
>
>> Result: No change in PDif compression. These three antennas are
>> still as bad as they were before.
>>
>> Comment 1: We must be barking up the wrong tree. All the tests I
>> can recall doing in the past couple years have exonerated the T304.
>> Since the problem is manifest in the X-band system, and since the old
>> style X-band receivers did not show the compression, while the new style
>> ones do, is the problem somehow connected to the receivers, or the
>> switched power injection mechanism?
>
> One thought comes to mind. If we have ruled out the downconverters,
> except for passive components, only the receiver and sampler are left
> in the X band system. Are we seeing compression in the sampler module
> before the digitizer? That can be tested by reducing the output power
> set point by 3 to 6 dB. Our conventional set point produces a sampler
> RMS of about 11, so there is some room to reduce the power. Have we
> already done this?
>
More information about the evlatests
mailing list