[evlatests] EVLA Sensitivity
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Thu Feb 28 18:28:40 EST 2013
As part of the 'NSF Construction Report', I've been doing some
simple tests to make sure we're not exaggerating our successes.
One of the report items is whether we've made our sensitivity
goals. I have included in the report values for the SEFD which Emmanuel
generates from the 'stress tests'. These are based on calibrated
autocorrelations -- theoretically, these should be fine, but ... The
values he provided me were rather lower than I expected to see at some
bands, so I ran a short test at noon today, observing 3C48 (known flux
density) and a noise field, 3 degrees away. Basic calibration was done,
and histograms of the noise field were made. Antennas with clearly
discrepant system temperatures were excluded (generally only 2 or 3 per
band).
The results were so encouraging (read ... *good*) that I thought
I'd share them. Below is a table with the project required SEFD,
Emmanuel's SEFD, and these new measurements. Emmanuel's values come
from mid-band. Mine are from two, well separated frequencies. I
include both, with the lower frequency first.
Band Req. Emmanuel Rick
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
L 325 342 330 383
S 235 246 277 206
C 245 274 258 207
X 300 237 218 218
Ku 385 212 215 231
K 650 402 325 373
Ka 750 561 518 765
Q 1220 1093 1200 2630
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NB Q-band requirement applies to lower end of band.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list