[evlatests] New PDif compression test
Barry Clark
bclark at nrao.edu
Fri Jul 27 16:28:04 EDT 2012
The old style X band receivers have very low output levels; most
end up with the T304 input attenuators pegged at zero.
Rick Perley wrote:
> Following yesterday's meeting, I put together a Taurus A (3C144)
> test file, which cycles amongst the four lowest frequency bands (L, S,
> C, X) on and off Taurus A. The file is 45 min long (two cycles around
> -- could be made shorter for quick tests), and ran at noon today.
>
> This source is actually better for testing PDif compression overall
> than Cygnus A, as it has a higher flux density than Cyg A above 3 GHz.
>
> I've taken a quick look at the results. Our compression problem is
> seen at all four bands, and on almost all antennas. After I finish up
> my talk for the Director's review (this weekend), I'll make up a
> 'compression table' for all bands. The compression is higher at low
> frequencies, but this is not surprising, given that the source is
> stronger at low frequencies.
>
> Many have asked if a clear separation between 'old style' and 'new
> style' X-band receivers can be seen. Cygnus wasn't strong enough to
> make permit this judgement. Taurus is. The answer is: Yes -- the
> 'old style' receivers appear to have no compression. The 'new style' do.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
More information about the evlatests
mailing list