[evlatests] MCAF/TelCal test

[Bryan Butler]

this was just to test that the changes to MCAF and TelCal weren't going 
to blow up in our face.  a simple cautionary step.

the functionality changes were already tested in the test MCAF and 
TelCal versions.

	-bryan


Joseph P. McMullin wrote, On 9/8/11 12:14 PM:
> Can someone elaborate on what changes in MCAF/TelCal you were testing
> (i.e., what were you expecting to see?); I wasn't aware of looming changes
> this week.
> Thanks.
>
> Joe
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Rick Perley<rperley at nrao.edu>  wrote:
>>     Ken/Bryan ran a short test, with changes to MCAF/TelCal.
>>
>>     Results:
>>
>>     Test 1:  An 'OSRO'-style observation at X-band:
>>
>>     All data look fabulous.  The only issue seen is that antenna 26
>> gives only noise -- no fringes -- and is not flagged.  (Ken says he is
>> aware of this, and has no idea what is wrong).
>>
>>     Test 2:  A 'RSRO'style observation at X and C bands:
>>
>>     Same as above -- phases and amplitudes are stable and strong (with
>> the exception noted above.  Note that antenna 26 fringes nicely at
>> C-band).
>>     One small curiosity -- presumably unrelated to the test:  ea11, at
>> C-band, and in IF 'C' only, dropped its amplitude by about half near the
>> end of the test.  The transition from high to low was essentially
>> instantaneous.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ken Sowinski wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Bryan Butler wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> so rick will look at the data (cursorily - just load it and make sure
>>>> it's not non-sensical).
>>>
>>> Rick,
>>>
>>> I put a page on your keyboard with the names of two test
>>> observations that were just run:
>>>
>>> X_osro.005
>>> CrsroXrsro_3C84
>>>
>>>
>>> Ken
>> _______________________________________________
>> evlatests mailing list
>> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>>
>>
>
>
>