[evlatests] S-Band Performance
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Wed Jan 26 17:23:53 EST 2011
A short report on S-band performance during the 'flux densities' run.
Executive Summary: With a single exception, amplitude stability
(after gain correction through application of 'switched power') is
better than 1% over the 30 hour period.
Some details:
Observing setup same as at C-band.
Eleven antennas fringed well: 6 7 8 9 10 12 14 15 24 27 28
All antennas show the same 24-hour diurnal gain periodicity as seen
at other bands -- 4% amplitude (power). As at the other bands, this is
removed to better than 1% by application of PDif power monitor.
Three antennas show poor stability in their switched power monitor:
6RCP (both IF 'A' and 'B'), 7RCP (A and B) and 27LCP (C and D). Of
these, 6RCP is by far the worst -- with 'noise' or variations of nearly
50% in the PDif value. This is so large that these data had to be
discarded. Even after careful editing, the post-correction gains were
unstable to 5%.
The reported system temperature for antenna 7 is far higher than the
others, especially in the lower half of the band (80 K). However, this
is almost certainly an error in the recorded Tcals, as the range in
reported Tsys from source to source is also a factor of 2 to 3 too high.
Two subbands are heavily affected by interference, centered near
2180 and 2325 MHz. (The latter of these is digital radio). Despite the
strong RFI, channels outside the broadcast frequency span, but within
the subband, appear to be fine, and calibrated nicely.
The strong RFI in these two subbands does however destroy the
switched power calibration system (as expected). Eric has written a new
task 'SYCOP' that permits the user to copy the SY tables from an
RFI-free subband to any subband with comprised switched power. This
should be a valid procedure for monitoring and correcting electronic
gain variations, but will introduce a scaling which should be removed by
regular calibration on a source of know flux density.
Elevation gains were fitted -- as expected, the coefficients are
very small, and virtually certain to be due to small elevation
dependencies in the electronics.
Polarization calibration was as spectacularly successful in this
band as in the others done so far (Ku, X, and C). The effect of
satellite downlinks is seen in 3C138 (dec = 16) at frequencies above
3.70 GHz. (The other three polarization calibrators are much further
north, and were not affected).
Bandpass stability was about as good as can be expected at these
frequencies (pk-pk of a couple percent).
Phase stability was only modest -- ten or twenty degrees from source
to source. The patterns are the same as seen at higher frequencies, and
it appears the scatter is proportional to frequency. This might suggest
atmosphere, but I'm dubious, given the good weather and short
baselines. A close analysis will be needed (and is being deferred until
I can finish reduction of the remaining four frequency bands).
More information about the evlatests
mailing list