[evlatests] Switch STability tests, cont.
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Mon Aug 1 14:12:22 EDT 2011
A review of the visibility gains from the band change/switch
stability tests reveals some interesting results. Some 'global'
characteristics can be discerned. There are a large number of
'one-ofs', some of which I note below.
1) Ku-band is unique in its poor amplitude stability (defined here
as scan to scan, not within any one scan). In all cases, all four IFs
change in similar ways -- this looks like pointing, but this conclusions
is not supported by review of the higher frequency stability. This
could be pointing nonetheless, *if* the collimation values are very
poor. For some antennas, the variation in one polarization is similar,
but larger than, that in the other. This can also be due to pointing,
so long as the collimation values are poorly determined.
2) K, Ka, and Q bands clearly show the effects of residual pointing
errors -- despite using 'referenced pointing'. The variations are
common to all four IFs, and scale roughly with frequency. Antennas
which are especially notable here are: ea02, ea06, ea11, and ea18.
3) Some amplitude variations are seen in all three high frequency
bands common to the UX converter: 7A, 16D, and 20 C and D.
4) L-band shows a number of high variations, looking like switch
issues. These are always on both IFs of a single polarization. The
antennas are: 12R, 13R, 14R and 14L (variations are different), 18R and
18L, 24 on all IFs, 25R, and 28L.
5) X-band is the most unstable band (discounting the problems noted
at Ku-band). At least half the antennas show gain variations well above
the noise, and much worse than L, S, or C bands.
6) S and C bands are remarkably, and gratifyingly stable. The only
exceptions are:
9CD at C-band, 16D at S-band, 18D at C-band, and 24C at S-band.
Interested parties in all this should review the (volumnous)
printouts, in my office.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list