[evlatests] Strange Tcals and Switched Power behavior

Rob Long rlong at nrao.edu
Mon Nov 1 11:34:32 EDT 2010


I looked at these antennas and don't believe that the LO timing is off 
by 10 ms (in the antenna). Did we see this problem before the power outage?

Rob

Ken Sowinski wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Rick Perley wrote:
> 
>>    At L-band:  Most of the values are quite nonsensical.  Typical
>> values are 20 to 50 K.  Some of them are over 200K.  One antenna (24, on
>> all IFs) has *negative* values of Tcal.
>>    A S-band,  the antennas with receivers have at least reasonable
>> values in the table.  I note that antennas without receivers have
>> reasonable values also -- one wonders how this can be ...
>>    At C-band, three antennas, which produce decent fringes, have Tcal =
>> 0.000  (Antenna 14 and 23 on all IFs, and antenna 16 on B and D IFs).
>>    At X-band, all values look reasonable (but are they right?)
> 
> Rich has been working on this in mcaf and we should look at
> it again when he has deplyed a new version.  Independently
> Vivek is looking at how to verify that we have correct Tcals
> in the parameters database.
> 
>>    I also note that antennas 10 and 24 are not detecting the
>> synchronous power -- either the noise diodes are not switching, or the
>> synchronous detection system is broken.  The reported values are all
>> uniformly distributed about zero.  This is the case on all IFs, and at
>> all bands.
> 
> Evidence is that the noise tubes are not turned off because
> the are detected in the downconverters.  (I just checked this.)
> That means that the antenna timing must be off by exactly
> 10 msec, or something is wrong with timing in all four station
> boards connected to each of these antennas.  Rob, Bruce???
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests




More information about the evlatests mailing list