[evlatests] Subarray 2 problems

[Vivek Dhawan]

The files sent to operations had "special instructions"
61140a.obs = K band said "Sub 1 = EVLA"
61140b.obs = Q band said "Sub 2 = VLA"

Somewhere along I realized sub 1 was not in the majority, but did
not change the instructions to match, semi-delibrately testing
another part of user blunder space.

According to the operator log, the files were started together,
failed, and then were renamed and started 30s apart.

Walter Brisken wrote:
> 
> Hi Vivek,
> 
> Can you confirm one thing for me (something else may come up later too.)
> 
> In the data you loaded into AIPS, which subarray is sub 1? (ie VLA or 
> EVLA?)  Looking through the documents I claim that sub 1 is VLA and sub 
> 2 is EVLA (like your note about minority/majority subarray suggests), 
> but I see the executor setting EVLA up for Kband and VLA for Q band 
> which is inconsistent with your table below.  It would be handy to know 
> which leg of this triangle inequality is broken.
> 
> I have already found some weird stuff.  Probably one broken thing in 
> idcaf and lots of confusing stuff coming from the executor.  More later...
> 
> -Walter
>