[evlatests] Hour-long X-band observation results
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Wed Jun 27 18:17:46 EDT 2007
Most of this is old news, but just for the record, I write this
down.
The last hour of Software Time yesterday was utilized for tracking a
single strong calibrator at a single band -- Xband. The CMP timing
issues were resolved prior to this observation. A number of interesting
characteristics were found from inspection of the data.
1) Flagging.
a) Unflagged data appeared in the archive at 22:50:20, but the
antennas did not reach the source until about 22:50:38. Some occasional
flagging of EVLA antennas prior to this time was noted. No flagging was
seen on any VLA antenna.
b) The operator's log noted antenna 13 having a focus error for
about two minutes during the observation. This was caught by the
flagger. A similar event (as judged by the amplitude loss) on the same
antenna at a later time -- but not noted in the log -- was also flagged
correctly.
c) Antenna 19 was noted by the operator as having a large rotation
error. The bad data were correctly flagged.
d) However, a loss of good data from antenna 9 (a VLA antenna) in
the middle of the observation was not flagged.
2) Correlator Controller Reorganizations
Two events which are the signature of the correlator controller
getting itself reorganized occurred. Neither was flagged. The
signature is this: There are a few (<10) seconds of bad data (low and
ragged amplitudes), followed by a 10-second gap (which starts on a
ten-second tick), followed by good data.
3) CMP rebooting effects.
Just prior to the beginning of this run, the CMP was rebooted by
Hichem. The subsequent data are quite remarkable -- all the following
effects can be ascribed safely to the rebooting process:
a) The amplitudes on all antennas suddenly changed to a new
value, typically 10% different. The cause of this was easily found to
be due to the Tsys values -- prior to the change, the Tsys values were
fixed at a constant (and incorrect) value. When the CMP got its act
together, correct data, and correct visibility amplitudes began.
b) The phases on all VLA antennas were spinning at a remarkable
rate. At a particular moment (different for each antenna), which was
always the first record following a ten-second tick, the phases began to
track properly. The resynchronization clearly followed a DCS ordering.
The moment of phase lock-in lagged that of correct amplitudes
by 9 to 18 seconds.
As noted, all the phenomena here are explained by the reboot
process, and should not be a concern. What is notable is how long this
takes -- the last antenna to get synchronized (#27, at N56) was nearly 3
minutes following the beginning of the data stream. We don't know
exactly when the CMP was rebooted. It might be prudent to allow for 5
minutes, following the initialization of a CMP reboot, before data
should be taken.
4) And odd pointing situation?
Four antennas -- 1, 7, 9, and 27, showed rhythmic amplitude drops,
with a ten-second period, equal on all IFs, and synchronized with each
other, for about one minute. These look like pointing offsets. The
amplitudes drop by about 10%. The situation corrected itself, and no
other such instances were seen.
5) Baselines.
The hour-long observation showed that the VLA antenna phases are
changing at a rate compatible with Vivek's estimation of about a 1-meter
error (on the longest spacings) in the Bx, By coordinates which, if due
to rotation of the coordinate frame, corresonds to a time error of
something less than 1 second. This problem affects VLA antennas only.
EVLA antennas look good.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list