[evlatests] P band, 4 band and power levels
Barry Clark
bclark at nrao.edu
Wed Jun 13 18:47:43 EDT 2007
We are fairly insensitive to the relative power of P and 4 bands.
I should think that fixed attenuators added to the 4 band cable at
installation time would suffice. On the spectral plot display, setting
the peak of the 4 band bump between 0 dB and 3 dB above the P band bump
sounds OK to me. But 15 dB sounds too much - it will decrease the headroom
available to the P band.
> From evlatests-bounces at donar.cv.nrao.edu Wed Jun 13 16:27:50 2007
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:27:31 -0600
> From: Paul Harden <pharden at nrao.edu>
>
>
> Ken Sowinski wrote:
> > The quick summary is that we need to do a better job of
> > matching spectral power density between the two bands.
>
> There has always been confusion and disagreement on how to handle these
> narrow band signals. Theoretically, with the 2-4MHz bandwidth of 4-band
> compared to the 40MHz bandwidth of P-band, 4-band should be attenuated
> in the order of 10-13 dB. At present, there is no difference in how the
> two bands are handled within the T301 4/P Converter.
>
> Recent power spectral plots confirm 4-band indeed needs about 12dB or
> more of attenuation. This empirical data lets us know what we need to
> do -- attenuate the 4-band signal prior to upconversion to equalize it
> to P-band's total power.
>
> Attenuators on the 4-band channel can be easily added (there's a place
> for them on the circuit boards). In the interim, coaxial attenuators
> can be added to "play around" with the attenuation that makes everyone
> happy before modifying the 4/P Converters (a relatively easy mod).
>
> > Except for antenna 18 all the 4 meter bandpasses are about 15 dB above
> > P band bandpasses. Was the T301 in antenna 18 built differently
>
> Paul Harden
>
>
More information about the evlatests
mailing list