[evlatests] K-Band tuning and polarization
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Tue Aug 28 15:34:55 EDT 2007
An experiment was run last night to check tuning and
cross-polarization across K-band.
A clean point-source (2007+404) was observed for two hours, centered
on meridian transit. The parallactic angle rotation of over 100
degrees, plus the high flux density (about 2 Jy) should ensure decent
polarization solutions. Seven or eight short (70 second) scans at each
frequency were made.
Frequencies tuned were (in IF1, IF2 pairs), in GHz:
18.125, 19.025
20.025, 21,024
22.025, 23.025
24.025, 25.025
26.025, 26.025 (I wanted 27.025 for BD, but Ken was concerned that
attempting to do so would crash the entire script).
BW = 50 MHz.
Antennas 11 (moved, primary parameters not derived), 13 (optical
power low, no synch. power), and 23 (stuck subreflector) were not
operational. None of these was flagged as bad, by the system.
A number of antennas, which gave good fringes, were flagged as bad
by the system. This behavior differed between frequencies and
polarizations.
All other EVLA antennas fringed, but there were some problems:
1) 21D gave no fringes at 21.025 and 23.025 GHz.
2) 26B gave no fringes at 23.025 and 25.025 GHz.
3) Amplitude stability in IF#2 was very poor at 21.025 and 23.025
GHz -- especially in RCP. Record-to-record variability of up to 50%.
Stability was also poor at 25.025 GHz -- but not as unsteady as the
previous listed frequencies.
I QUACKed the first 45 seconds of each scan (as a precautionary
measure), as some antenna/IFs were slow in getting stabilized.
With the small amount of data remaining (about 15 seconds of
integration, for each frequency, for eight scans), the polarization
calibration program PCAL was run. The solutions, referenced to antenna
18, show that except at the highest frequencies, the 'D'
cross-polarization terms, for most antennas, are well below the desired
limit of 5%.
No statement of stability can be made from this test.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list