[evlatests] C/X Phase test, Oct 3/4.
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Fri Oct 6 16:45:35 EDT 2006
Some dynamic time was available on short notice, so I made up a 3.5
hour observation of a strong calibrator, 3c454.3, in which I observed
alternately between 6 and 3.6 cm, with two minutes on each. The
observation began near midnight, at meridian transit . At the
beginning, the elevation was 71 degrees. At the end, it was 39
degrees. The weather was calm and dry, with T = 7.5 C (+/- 1.0), DP =
0.7C, and wind of 1 m/sec (+/- 1msec). All observations were made at
the default frequencies, with 12.5 MHz BW -- hence the Flukes are set to
their default value of 118.75/218.75 MHz.
Oddities were found both for EVLA antennas, and VLA antennas. I
report on these separately.
A) EVLA antennas.
a) There were no phase jumps or other short-term phase oddities
between EVLA antennas.
b) When referenced to a stable VLA antenna, three of the 41
individual scans had a large phase jump. The jumps are all identical
for each EVLA antenna/IF. For two of these, the jump was the same.
c) There were a number of minor amplitude issues -- usually at the
beginning of the scans -- which I mainly attribute to the reaction of
the Tsys monitoring machinery reacting to changes in power when changing
bands.
d) There were notable long-term phase drifts for all EVLA antennas.
I used a central VLA antenna as phase reference (against which all VLA
antennas are stable -- however see the important notes in section B for
exceptions). The table below shows the total phase change over 3.5
hours for each EVLA antenna/IF, at each band.
Ant. IF C-phase X-phase
-----------------------------------------------------
13 AC +40 -140
13 BD 0 -180
14 AC -10 -90
14 BD -60 -130
16 AC 110 no fringes
16 BD 70 -270
18 AC 0 -50
18 BD -50 -90
24 AC +20 -70
24 BD -20 -110
26 AC no rcvr +750
---------------------------------------------------
Observations:
i) The huge phase wind for antenna 26 is likely a baseline error
-- this corresponds to about a 10 cm error, larger than I thought we
had, but plausible I suppose. Ant 26 is now on a different pad, so this
can be easily checked with fresh data.
ii) The BD phase change is always about 40 degrees more negative
than the AC phase change.
iii) The phase change is smooth in all cases, but is certainly not
due to baseline error. If due to uncompensated path length, I would
argue that it is internal to the antennas, since the outside temperature
was constant, and the data were taken mostly past midnight, certainly
long enough for equilibrium to be established. But if it is due to
internal temperature changes, why should these be changing during a calm
stable night? Perhaps more likely is an elevation effect (which might
combine internal temperature stratification)? But why would 13BD show
no effect at all at C-band, but a half-turn of phase at X-band? Indeed,
the differences between 6 and 3.6 cm behavior are puzzling to me.
Perhaps a true pundit can explain this.
B) VLA antennas.
A new and very troublesome phenomenon was immediately found -- Some
antenna/IFs have non-repeating phases (after having changed band).
The effect was especially noted at X-band, but was present in C-band
as well. I emphasize that the EVLA antennas did not see any of the
phenomena described below.
At C-band, antenna/IFs 12AC and 20AC showed multiple phase states --
the phases are stable within each 2-minute observation, but the observed
phases were as much as 80 degrees away from the 'base' state. This
effect was especially bad in these two antennas, but 'single' versions
of this occurred in two others: 15AC, 25BD, In addition, phase
'spins' occured in some scans in many other VLA antennas: 3, 7AC, 9AC,
10AC, and 11AC.
At X-band, the situation is worse. 3BD has a bistable phase, with
phase spins between them. Multiple (but mostly stable within a scan)
phases are seen on 5AC, 6BD, 8BD, 9AC, 12AC, 20AC, and 27AC.
The consequence of these unsteady phases upon VLA imaging is likely
to be significant.
I was ready to blame the Flukes for all this, but Ken is wondering
if the new system controller is responsible.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list