[evlatests] EVLA Performance, Nov 28
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Wed Nov 29 11:42:57 EST 2006
I ran a system check, for all antennas and bands, last night, with
the standard setup:
- Spectral Line mode '4', 12.5 MHz BW, giving 16 channels in each of
the four correlations.
- Default frequencies (except at L-band, where I put the AC side to
1485 MHz, to avoid the 'suckouts')
- 5 second averaging.
- Observed a strong point-source for two scans of two minutes at
each band.
- Referenced pointing was done at all bands, except L-band, to try
ensure on-axis gains.
In general, the EVLA antennas performed very well indeed!
Viritually no flagging was needed (other than antennas without
receivers), and not funny data (defined as jumps in amplitude or phase)
were seen *within any one scan*.
However, the now-familiar system-wide phase jump was noted at every
band, between the two observations made at each band.
Band-dependent details follow:
1) L-band
All EVLA antennas performed nicely, except 23.
There was a global phase jump of 84 degrees (at 1485 MHz) and 50
degrees (at 1385 Mhz) (plus/minus a couple of degrees) between the two
observations, made 21 minutes apart.
Sensitivity of antennas 13, 14, 16, and 26 are below the VLA
average. Sensitivity of 18 and 24 are near the VLA mean.
2) C-Band
Antennas 23 and 26 were both dead on all IFs.
A global phase jump of about 110 degrees (both AC and BD ) occured
between scans. There is evidence the jumps are of different size for
some antennas: 120 degrees (AC) and 95 degrees for 14, 16, and 24, but
104 (AC) and 110 (BD)for antennas 13 and 18. See below for better
evidence at other bands ...
The 5 working antennas remain the most sensitive in the array.
Antenna 13 is the poorest of the EVLA antennas -- about the same as the
better VLA antennas.
The pointing corrections determined were very large for some
antennas: 0.4 arcminutes in El for antenna 14, 0.7 arcminutes in Az for
antenna 24.
3) X-Band
Antenna 23 gave no useable data. All others performed well.
A global phase jump -- with different values for different antennas,
was noted: Antennas 14, 16, 24 and 26 jumped by 90 degrees on AC, and
by 140 degrees on BD, while 13 and 18 jumped by 55 degrees on AC, and
110 on BD.
Antennas 13, 16, 18, 24 and 26 have normal sensitivity. Antenna 14
is rather poorer on the AB side, and very poor (sensitivity down by a
factor of about 2) on the CD side.
pointing corrections were not as extreme at X-band as at C-band, but
still notable: 0.3 arcminutes in El for antenna 14, and 0.3 arcminutes
in Az for antenna 24.
4) K-Band
Antenna 23 gave no fringes, and antenna 26's K-band fringes are so
weak as to be barely discernible.
There was again a global phase jump -- of two different magnitudes
for different antennas: Antennas 13 and 18 jumped by 100 and 135
degrees (AC and BD), while the others jumped by 150 and 85 degrees (AC
and BD).
Referenced pointing failed for antenna 26 -- possibly because of the
low sensitivity, but also possibly due to a large pointing error. The
solutions obtained (all differential w.r.t X-band) are small, except for
antenna 24, for which the El collimation was -0.3 arcminutes.
Sensitivities for antennas 13, 14, 16, and 18, are all about
normal. Atnenna 24's sensitivity is about a factor of 2 to 4 too low.
Antenna 26's sensitivity is at least an order of magnitude too low.
5) Q-Band
No fringes from 23 or 26 -- all others fringed well.
The `global' jumps are more difficult to discern, as the phase
stability is of nearly similar magnitude. There was certainly a jump
between scans, with a magnitude of near 100 degrees. A more careful
perusal will be needed (to follow).
Referenced pointing worked for 13, 14, 16, 18, and 24. Differential
(collimation) corrections were small (0.1 arcmin) for all antennas.
Sensitivities of all 5 antennas are within normal bounds. It should
be noted that antenna 24 is easily the best in the array.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list