[evlatests] L-band Sensitivity, cont.
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Tue Jul 25 13:06:15 EDT 2006
On April 20, I ran a sensitivity test in L-band covering the entire
frequency range available to the VLA -- 1275 through 1750 MHz. There
were 7 different frequency pairs, using spectral line mode and 12.5 MHz
BW. I observed Cygnus A, cold sky, and the known flux density
calibrator, 3C48. The goal (then) was to calibrate the Tcals ( from
measuring the apparent Tsys difference between Cyg A and cold sky, and
assuming the efficiency as known), and to determine the actual
sensitivity, from AIPS Weights on 3C48, and noise statistics on cold
sky. Note that all of these frequency settings used the same L301
value: 12928 MHz.
Other interests have prevented full calibration of these data.
Given the interest in frequency-dependent sensitivity, I recovered
these data, and measured the AIPS weights on 3C48.
Only antennas 13 and 14 worked properly in this experiment. Antenna
16 gave fringes only on the IF 2 (B/D) side.
In the following table, I give the AIPS weights for EVLA antennas
13, 14, and 16, There are two values for the lowest 6 frequencies -- as
we observed 3C48 twice at these frequencies. A mystery is why the EVLA
aips weights are so very different between these pairs -- which are
separated by 90 minutes in time, and 9 degrees in elevation (from 65 to
74 degrees). Checking the Tsys values shows no difference in Tsys, so
the apparent change in sensitivity is a real change in gain
(efficiency), not due to an increase in Tsys.
Remember: AIPS Weights are proportional to (efficiency/Tsys)^2.
High values are good. Typical VLA values are 80 to 100 in the primary
frequency range of 1350 -- 1500 MHz. 'xx' means no data were
obtained. The values at 1565 MHz are dicy -- lots of RFI!
13
14
16
Frequency A B C D |
A B C D | A
B C D
-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------
1275 98/76 96/77 |
96/63 93/77 |
xx/xx xx/xx
1310 105/79 98/87
| 104/102 110/97 |
102/80 89/73
1340 97/79 93/77 |
105/67 105/87 |
xx/xx xx/xx
1370 107/67 104/88
| 104/107 116/111 |
102/81 87/73
1410 69/56 57/70 |
106/72 111/94 |
xx/xx xx/xx
1440 74/51 72/61
| 92/99 108/93 |
82/70 81/75
1470 34 26 |
65 83 |
xx xx
1510 33 42
| 83 78
| 64 69
1565 26 23 |
48 58 |
xx xx
1590 xx xx
| 68 68
| 50 66
1620 25 20 |
36 45 |
xx xx
1670 13 29
| 68 70
| 52 68
1706 15 8 |
38 45 |
xx xx
1750 3 13
| 57 55
| 43 52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion:
The general loss of sensitivity with increasing frequency is
clear. However, the decline is very different for different antennas,
with antenna 13 showing (by far) the most extreme variation.
If there is time later today, I'll repeat this, with 4 (maybe 5 if
antenna 24 comes up at L-band today) EVLA antennas. We need to monitor
the power levels into the sampler, to see if any of these variations are
due to power level variations.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list