[evlatests] EVLA status: AR603, 23jul06 (Sunday)
mrupen at nrao.edu
mrupen at nrao.edu
Mon Jul 24 11:51:52 EDT 2006
AR603 23jul06 17:36-19:06 IAT
------------------------------
mpr 24jul06
Report of data quality (as measured by AIPS weights)
EVLA ant. 13,14,16,18,24 included
Standard continuum, C X L bands (L band uses L1 setup)
3.3s averaging
elevation 13-54 degrees
OK weather (cumuliform clouds, API 3-4 degrees)
OVERVIEW
20cm:
ant. 13
IFs AC no fringes
IFs BD horrible (worst or next-to-worst antenna)
ant. 14 pretty bad -- bottom quartile
ant. 16
IFs AC bad (bottom quartile)
IFs BD horrible (worst or next-to-worst antenna)
ant. 18
IF A horrible (worst in array)
IF C no fringes
IFs BD best of all EVLA IFs -- puts this in the top third of the antennas
ant. 24 no data
6cm:
ant. 13 no data
ant. 14 is excellent, as usual
no phase jumps when changing bands
ant. 16
IFs AC very unstable amplitude gains, and very low quality (worst
antenna by far)
IFs BD were quite good (among top 4 antennas)
no phase jumps when changing bands
ant. 18 no data
ant. 24 no data
4cm:
ant. 13
IFs AC no frings
IF B pretty good (upper quartile)
IF D middle of the pack
ant. 14 lousy (near the bottom), except IF A is in the middle
ant. 16 fine (upper quartile)
ant. 18
IFs A & B were middle-of-the-road
IF C no fringes
IF D near the bottom
ant. 24 horrible (near the bottom in all IFs) -- IF C esp. bad
-------------------------------------------------------------
AIPS weights: median ranking, out of a nominal
26 antennas
--> 1 is the best; 26 is the worst <--
20cm 6cm 4cm
13-A n.f. ---- n.f.
13-C n.f. ---- n.f.
13-B 26 ---- 5
13-D 25 ---- 12.5
14-A 19.5 1 14
14-C 24 4 25
14-B 19 2 20
14-D 16 2 26
16-A 21 26 5
16-C 20 26 6
16-B 25 3 6
16-D 26 4 4
18-A 26 ---- 15
18-C n.f. ---- n.f.
18-B 10 ---- 15
18-D 7 ---- 23
24-A ---- ---- 26
24-C ---- ---- 26
24-B ---- ---- 23
24-D ---- ---- 24
---- ==> no data
n.f. ==> no fringes (low amp, random phase)
-------------------------------------------------------------
AIPS weights: median fractional weight
mean weight is calculated for each record
fractional weight is the weight for the EVLA antenna,
divided by that mean
the median fractional weight is the median value of the
fractional weights, derived from the distribution across
all records in which the antenna was present
--> high is good <---
--> the average VLA antenna is 1.0 <--
--> 0.1 is 10 times worse than the average;
10.0 is 10 times better <--
20cm 6cm 4cm
13-A n.f. ---- n.f.
13-C n.f. ---- n.f.
13-B 0.65 ---- 1.17
13-D 0.64 ---- 0.99
14-A 0.87 1.55 0.97
14-C 0.69 1.23 0.42
14-B 0.88 1.59 0.85
14-D 0.95 1.42 0.37
16-A 0.82 0.39 1.16
16-C 0.83 0.30 1.17
16-B 0.73 1.45 1.14
16-D 0.32 1.19 1.20
18-A 0.52 ---- 0.95
18-C n.f. ---- n.f.
18-B 0.99 ---- 0.95
18-D 1.08 ---- 0.73
24-A ---- ---- 0.40
24-C ---- ---- 0.03
24-B ---- ---- 0.78
24-D ---- ---- 0.73
---- ==> no data
n.f. ==> no fringes (low amp, random phase)
-------------------------------------------------------------
=======================================================================
=======================================================================
More information about the evlatests
mailing list