[evla-sw-discuss] OMS version 2.4.0

[Mark Claussen]

I can confirm Jim's try on 2.4.0, with the same Java exception
error (I tried end of last week too).

Mark

On Monday 25 January 2016, Jim Ogle wrote:
> I was unable to get 2.4.0 to run from gygax on Friday afternoon from the vlbaops account, it gave me a lengthy Java exception error that started with 
> 
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no ocijdbc10 in java.library.path
> 
> 
> I could get oms-test,  oms-old and the Windows version to start.  I figured I'd try again Monday in case some of the software changes hadn't propagated everywhere yet.
> 
> Over the weekend the dynam script failed as did an ops script called run_scenario, both with the same archive error:
> 
> FILE2DYNQ: ERROR  ORA-00257: archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed.
> 
> Not surprisingly, I found that I still cannot get 2.4.0 to run this morning. 
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Barry Clark [mailto:bclark at aoc.nrao.edu]
> > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 1:16 PM
> > To: evla-sw-discuss; Jim Ogle; vlbatape at aoc.nrao.edu; Mark Claussen
> > Cc: Peggy Perley
> > Subject: OMS version 2.4.0
> > 
> > We have moved up the versions of OMS.  The current version is 2.4.0, which
> > is the version previously running under test.
> > Changes:
> > Uses a java version of the 'scenario' program, which:
> >      Is much faster than having it run remotely
> >      Gives better diagnostics
> >      Gives extra priority to higher frequency observations For some users with
> > login-based database credentials, it is
> >     no longer necessary to enter a password The 'sched' program is also run
> > locally rather than remotely.
> > There is a new main program, with launch script 'gps2clock',
> >     which reads GPS data from monitor data and stores it in
> >     the vlbaparm database.
> > 
> > I believe the old version is still available through the 'oms-old'
> > launch script.
> > 
> > I have not tested this at all, but the windows versions 'winoms-old'
> > will probably work, and 'winoms-current' may work, but will be missing some
> > features, especially the ability to run 'sched'.
> > 
> > The 'oms-test' script currently executes the same version, but I shall soon
> > replace it with something more exotic.
> > 
> > Please let me know about bugs and problems.
> 
> 
>