[evla-sw-discuss] BigEndian flaw in the BDFReader

Wayne Koski wkoski at nrao.edu
Tue Jun 29 11:59:55 EDT 2010


Kevin:

Just so you and others know, as a person in the basement who used CP/M, 
DOS, and Windows:

I don't care about how a given processor architecture stores data.  I 
just work with said processor architecture and developed OS's, so I do 
things correctly when I store, manipulate, or transfer data.

Little, Big, or Bi-endian is something you just deal with.  Nothing to 
defend or really to argue about IMHO.

-wayne-

Kevin Ryan wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:59 PM, James Robnett wrote:
>>   You have that backwards.
> 
> Why James!  I'd figured the first to defend wrong-endianness would be  
> one of the Windoze boys from the basement; certainly not our network  
> hero.
> 
>>   Probably open your egg on the wrong end too.
> 
> Guilty.
> 
> 
> 
>> james
>>
>>> If some dumbass would never had invented Little Endian in the first
>>> place, this (and countless similar problems) would not be such a pox
>>> on us over the past 30+ years.
>>>
>>> Good catch Keith.
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
>>> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
>> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss




More information about the evla-sw-discuss mailing list