[evla-sw-discuss] Metadata related to WIDAR: getting this to the SDM
Martin Pokorny
mpokorny at nrao.edu
Wed Feb 17 18:43:32 EST 2010
Michael Rupen wrote:
> correlationMode -- default to CROSS_AND_AUTO .
> The options are CROSS_AND_AUTO, CROSS_ONLY, AUTO_ONLY.
> The Configuration Mapper sets up the BlBs to produce as many
> auto-correlations as possible, so for OSRO and most RSRO we will
> be in the CROSS_AND_AUTO case. Note that this implies only that _some_
> auto-correlations are produced -- in general, and certainly for the first
> observations, we will have only half of the possible auto-correlations.
> It is the CBE's responsibility to store zeroes and binary flags for the
> unmeasured auto-correlations. We have used CROSS_ONLY in the past
> for manual BlB setups and to avoid bugs in the filler.
The CBE determines the value of correlationMode recorded in the BDFs
based on its configuration. If the CM always produces some
auto-correlations, then fixing this value in the SDM should be OK;
otherwise, we could end up with an inconsistency.
> axesOrderArray -- default to 1 6 BAL BAB SPW BIN SPP POL
> The number and order of the axes must match that of the visibility
> data in the BDF file. The ordering of those axes is implicit, as given
> by the ordering of the AxisName enumeration in Table 1 of the BDF
> definition document.
Actually, this should be BAL BAB SPW BIN SPP STO.
> numAntenna -- default to the value for the first scan I guess
This is determined by the CBE from the list of station ids in its
configuration document, and is recorded in the BDF. Must the values of
numAntenna be the same in the BDF and the ExecBlock table?
> numChan -- from the VCI fragment <widar:pp spectralChannels="XX">
> Note that the number of channels must be identical for all pol'n products
> at the moment (all OSRO and RSRO data).
When we do the Fourier transform in the CBE, the number of channels is
reduced by half; otherwise, not. In the BDF, the equivalent of "numChan"
is set by the CBE configuration document, and its value should account
for the final number of channels; the CM must account for that in
creating the CBE configuration message. Does MCAF need to do the same?
--
Martin
More information about the evla-sw-discuss
mailing list