[evla-sw-discuss] Controlling the baseband slope correctors

[bbutler at nrao.edu]

i don't think 10 seconds is fast enough when you want it - at frequency
changes.

-bryan


> Basically, I'd like to handle things like we do Set-and-Remember, that
> stuff appears automatically so we don't have to go bug the correlator
> all the time, and often enough that we can have a setup scan and be
> guaranteed to get a record in a reasonable time.  It doesn't look like
> providing that would be too big a burden on the network, and StBs mostly
> care about their peak effort, so doing it often is not a big pain for
> them also.
>
> Ken Sowinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Bryan Butler wrote:
>>>
>>> barry - are you thinking that the rms and slope will actually change on
>>> 10 second timescales?  or is that just to react to band changes?
>>
>> Barry will correct me if I have it wrong.  I believe he was
>> asking for rms as well as a measure of slope was to allow
>> for the possibility of setting the T304 attenuators based
>> on lag zero as a proxy for rms power at the sampler input.
>> If this is so, having it all the time could be useful.
>>
>> Ken
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss
>