[evla-sw-discuss] VCI -> JAXB - package name change

[Kevin Ryan]

Sonja,

On the other hand, are you sure this is a good idea?  Because doing  
that will break up packages; for example, the VCI 'package' will now  
actually be separated in two.  I would think that the complete VCI  
package, including the JAXB generated code should be kept together.   
In my mind, java packages are arranged by function rather than how  
their code is generated.

But that's just my humble opinion :)

Kevin




On Mar 17, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Kevin Ryan wrote:

> It's okay by me.
>
> Kevin
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Sonja Vrcic wrote:
>
>> I am wandering if anyone uses software package ca.nrc.widar.vci.jaxb.
>> This package is generated from the VCI schema using the build file  
>> provided in the directory
>> widar/schema/vci
>>
>> If nobody objects, I would like to change the packet name to:  
>> ca.nrc.widar.jaxb.vci
>>
>> This is not a necessary change, just an attempt to align packet  
>> names so that all JAXB generated "stuff" starts with
>> ca.nrc.widar.jaxb.*
>>
>> Sonja
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
>> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss