[evla-sw-discuss] Igloo and dropped mcast packets

Bryan Butler bbutler at nrao.edu
Tue Jun 2 13:50:49 EDT 2009


well, good that you identified the culprit.  igloo (or its replacement) 
should be considered a primary part of EVLA, so do what you think is 
best with that in mind.

	-bryan


James Robnett wrote, On 6/2/09 09:54:
>    I think I figured out why igloo was dropping those mcast
> packets.
> 
>    While ironing out the plans for the new 1Gbit VLA-AOC link
> I discovered that igloo isn't directly connected to the
> 146.88.201.xxx master switch.  It goes through a small switch
> in the correlator room we needed for a few extra 146.88.201
> drops in that room.
> 
>     The mcast traffic is being forwarded from a 1Gbit interface
> across to the 146.88.201 switch and then to that small 100Mbit
> switch.   My guess is that little switch isn't updating  mcast
> requests properly.  Back when we had one massive mcast group
> it never timed out but with the new fragmented list it wasn't
> updating in time.
> 
>     If we move igloo to the 10.64.100.xxx network or directly
> off the master 146.88.201.xxx switch the problem should go away.
> I'd prefer the former if igloo is going to become a primary
> part of EVLA.
> 
>     I'd suggest changing it's addressing when it's upgraded
> to RHEL5.3.
> 
> James
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss



More information about the evla-sw-discuss mailing list