[evla-sw-discuss] Igloo and dropped mcast packets
Bryan Butler
bbutler at nrao.edu
Tue Jun 2 13:50:49 EDT 2009
well, good that you identified the culprit. igloo (or its replacement)
should be considered a primary part of EVLA, so do what you think is
best with that in mind.
-bryan
James Robnett wrote, On 6/2/09 09:54:
> I think I figured out why igloo was dropping those mcast
> packets.
>
> While ironing out the plans for the new 1Gbit VLA-AOC link
> I discovered that igloo isn't directly connected to the
> 146.88.201.xxx master switch. It goes through a small switch
> in the correlator room we needed for a few extra 146.88.201
> drops in that room.
>
> The mcast traffic is being forwarded from a 1Gbit interface
> across to the 146.88.201 switch and then to that small 100Mbit
> switch. My guess is that little switch isn't updating mcast
> requests properly. Back when we had one massive mcast group
> it never timed out but with the new fragmented list it wasn't
> updating in time.
>
> If we move igloo to the 10.64.100.xxx network or directly
> off the master 146.88.201.xxx switch the problem should go away.
> I'd prefer the former if igloo is going to become a primary
> part of EVLA.
>
> I'd suggest changing it's addressing when it's upgraded
> to RHEL5.3.
>
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss
More information about the evla-sw-discuss
mailing list