[evla-sw-discuss] model propagation idea
Bruce Rowen
browen at nrao.edu
Mon May 19 13:42:51 EDT 2008
>
> Does anybody have issues with this port mapping scheme or the unicast
> UDP between Executor and the VCI for the delay models ?
Slightly related, I've updated the model schema
http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/asg/widar/schemata/cmib/models/
vciDelayModelBeta.html
to include optional parameters 'antennaId' [1-32] and 'ifId' [A-D]
should it be for whatever reason we decide to peek inside the XML
documents received at the MCCC. These attributes would allow for the
MCCC document reader to determine which antenna/IF the model is
intended for.
These parameters are optional so they should not be included unless
we go that route.
'baseBandId' [0-1] is still logical and we might consider making it
[R | L] (right/left) or even something more removed from plain
numbers just to improve the 'logicalness'* of it.
-Bruce
* following the lead of Steven Colbert
>
>
> Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss
More information about the evla-sw-discuss
mailing list