[evla-sw-discuss] model propagation idea

Bruce Rowen browen at nrao.edu
Mon May 19 13:42:51 EDT 2008


>
> Does anybody have issues with this port mapping scheme or the unicast
> UDP between Executor and the VCI for the delay models ?

Slightly related, I've updated the model schema

http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/asg/widar/schemata/cmib/models/ 
vciDelayModelBeta.html

to include optional parameters 'antennaId' [1-32] and 'ifId' [A-D]  
should it be for whatever reason we decide to peek inside the XML  
documents received at the MCCC. These attributes would allow for the  
MCCC document reader to determine which antenna/IF the model is  
intended for.

These parameters are optional so they should not be included unless  
we go that route.

'baseBandId' [0-1] is still logical and we might consider making it  
[R | L] (right/left) or even something more removed from plain  
numbers just to improve the 'logicalness'* of it.

-Bruce

* following the lead of Steven Colbert

>
>
> Kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss




More information about the evla-sw-discuss mailing list