[evla-sw-discuss] Delay models to station boards

Bruce Rowen browen at nrao.edu
Wed May 14 17:30:44 EDT 2008


On May 14, 2008, at 3:26 PM, Barry Clark wrote:
> Kevin has a valid point that we don't know whether datagrams will work
> adequately without a test.  However, I don't see how to arrange a
> realistic test without having the whole correlator room networking in
> place.  (Although actually, I am more concerned that datagrams might
> get lost within the mchost stack than I am about the network.)  What
> should we do to test deliveries?   (At a minimum, we should put a  
> sequence
> number in the document.)
>
> It's not totally clear that connected sockets help - having a document
> delivered late is in some ways worse than not at all.


The delay model is dumped if the activation time (epoch) has already  
passed.

> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss




More information about the evla-sw-discuss mailing list