[evla-sw-discuss] code organization

[John Benson]

Under NRAO.E2E there are also :

         ARCHIVE    (archive servlets)
         USERDB
         VO                (vo servlets)

The NRAO.EVLA.ARCHIVE is something else..

John


Rich Moeser wrote:
> Bryan Butler wrote:
>   
>> but i will enforce uniformity in those higher layers, however we decide is the 
>> best way to do it.
>>
>> and we haven't really even touched on the higher level organization, which, as i 
>> mentioned before, is more important in my opinion.  can we get rid of the "e2e" 
>> that we have now?  what to do about "commons"?  etc.
>>   
>>     
> Currently the structure of the higher layers is as follows:
>
> NRAO (root directory)
>             -> COMMONS (this contains reusable classes that can be used 
> by any project and by non-nrao developers, AngleFormat, AstroDate, 
> MathLib, and Util)
>             -> EVLA
>                            -> OBSERVE
>                            -> TRANSITION
>                            -> ARCHIVE
>                            -> COMMONS (reusable components and static 
> classes that only EVLA projects would use)
>                            ....etc, etc, etc
>             -> VLA
>                            ->JOBSERVE
>             -> VLBA
>                             -> OMS
>                            -> VLCj
>             -> E2E (this would be SSS)
>                             -> PST
>                             -> VOSERVER
>
> I'm quite satisfied with this directory structure. It's simple, natural 
> and difficult to get lost in. The root directory NRAO might seem a bit 
> unnecessary but it allows for other roots such as VENDOR, DRAO, or 
> whatever. I would probably change the COMMONS so that several types of 
> commons projects can exist. For example the EVLA project could have 
> COMMONS-UTIL (utility classes used exclusively by evla) and COMMONS-NET 
> (evla communications and network classes). (And, yes, I think the term 
> "commons" should be kept, indicating a collection of general purpose 
> classes.)
>
> I think E2E should be replaced with SSS and remain a subdirectory of NRAO.
>
> --Rich
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss
>
>