[evla-sw-discuss] MIB Data Port Spec revisions

[Bill Sahr]

Sonja,

Point taken.  I don't think there is a direct conflict between
what we do in a MIB broadcast DDR and the antenna ID inserted
in the correlator output data, but the two must be reconciled.

Bill


Vrcic, Sonja wrote:
> 
> 2. A revision to the DDR format has been proposed.
>     For the revised format:
>     - the Attention and Length fields have been dropped
>       (separate ports will be used instead of an Attention
>        bit, and the Length field is seen as unnecessary)
>     - the Antenna ID will be a STRING
>     - the Device ID will be a STRING
> 
> 
> I would like to remind you that on the Oct. 22 we agreed that the Antenna ID
> will be inserted in the correlator output data. We have 8 bits for Antenna
> ID. 
> 
> Sonja 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss