[evla-sw-discuss] Re: A MIB Requirement
Steven Durand
sdurand at aoc.nrao.edu
Fri Jan 25 16:59:25 EST 2002
Item #2 in the previous EMAIL states that the Device must power up in a
safe mode even if the MIB is missing or failed. This forces device
designers to install a interface micro to set all registers to safe
values upon start-up.
I understood that it might be possible for the MIB to set all the
registers to safe values upon start-up. This would remove the
requirement for an additional micro processor. Has this changed??
Wayne Koski wrote:
>
> I think we should be very causious in this. We have a situation here
> of power-on conditions which can be complex. So here is my take on it.
>
> 1. The MIB and Device at power-on will have a reset applied to them.
>
> Note that the above resets could be produced by the same reset
> device or different devices. We have not imposed a coordinated
> reset requirement. Thus the problem is different reset periods for
> the MIB and Device.
>
> 2. For the Device, its reset must place it into a SAFE mode of
> operation. It shouldn't harm itself or other Devices it may be
> connected too.
>
> This immediately protects the hardware, and the MIB can actually
> not be connected or the MIB can be in a failed state. In other
> words the Device should enter a SAFE mode of operation, with or
> without the presence of the MIB. I think this is what Kevin was
> trying in part to get across.
>
> 3. After the MIB resets, it can then load parameters, etc. in order
> to place the Device into an INTIALIZED mode of operation.
>
> Obviously the INITIALIZED mode show also not cause damage to the
> Device or any Devices connected to it.
>
> 4. A contentious possibility: Once a particular module has been
> INITIALIZED or in an OPERATIONAL mode, the MIB might signal a
> downstream Device that it is safe to apply signals from the
> upstream device. A method to use intermodule communications as
> an additional layer of protection.
>
> Example: The 1st LO Synthesizer is set to a value and the output
> power is determined to be in range. The Synthesizer could
> then signal the RF/LO/IF switch that the level could now
> be applied to the Front-end, etc.
>
> Just remember, I view the above as an additional layer of protection.
> Expensive items should be protected via hardware as much as possible.
>
> -wayne-
--
Steven Durand
Member of Technical Staff (MTS)
National Radio Astronomy Observatory
PO Box 0
1003 Lopezville Road
Socorro, NM 87801-0387
Office: (505)835-7103
Fax: (505)835-7027
More information about the evla-sw-discuss
mailing list