[Difx-users] num_stations limit in difxcalc {External}

[Geoffrey B. Crew]

IIRC (and it's been a long time) fortran compilers were originally 
multi-pass (not enough memory) so order of includes may not have been as 
important as long as no inconsistency appears. K&R C adopted the 
one-pass strategy, hence order matters.

If you're paranoid, try including it twice (with and without 
contradictory information) and see what complaints you get....

But moving it sooner should indeed be where this should end up.

On 9/5/23 19:58, Adam Deller via Difx-users wrote:
> Just wanted to check from someone who knows FORTRAN better than me 
> that that was okay, since at the moment it is being included after all 
> the variable declarations.

-- 
Geoff Crew
MIT Haystack Observatory
gbc at mit.edu