[Difx-users] difx2fits FQ table issue

Walter Brisken wbrisken at lbo.us
Wed May 17 09:00:54 EDT 2017


Hi Jan,

We think this is a difx2fits issue.  Could you try with difx 2.4 (with 
--override-version) to see if you see the same issues?  If not, is it 
possible you bundle up all the files needed to reproduce this and send my 
way?  A small test data set would really help.

 	Cheers,

 	Walter

On Wed, 17 May 2017, Jan Wagner wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> about difx2fits in current or recent DiFX trunk versions, and AIPS:
> I used 'difx2fits --difx' to get three single-scan .difx outputs
> into the same FITS. Under AIPS 31DEC16 a FITLD then produces a
> number of warnings. Some of you may already know about this general
> issue. On quick glance there might be three problems encountered
> during FITLD in total. Typical output:
>
> FITLD1: Sky frequencies (MHz) before re-ordering occurs:
>
> FITLD1: Incoming FREQID #   1
> FITLD1:  86348.00   86316.00   86284.00   86252.00
> FITLD1:  86220.00   86188.00   86156.00   86124.00
> FITLD1: Incoming FREQID #   2
> FITLD1:  86348.00   86316.00   86284.00   86252.00
> FITLD1:  86220.00   86188.00   86156.00   86124.00
> FITLD1: Incoming FREQID #   3
> FITLD1:  86348.00   86316.00   86284.00   86252.00
> FITLD1:  86220.00   86188.00   86156.00   86124.00
> FITLD1: !!!!! WARNING: FREQIDS   1 AND   2 ARE IDENTICAL
> FITLD1: !!!!! WARNING: FREQIDS   1 AND   3 ARE IDENTICAL
> FITLD1: !!!!! WARNING: FREQIDS   2 AND   3 ARE IDENTICAL
>
> FITLD1: Warning: table type GN is of zero length
> FITLD1: GETDEL: No IM entry stn  1 src   1 sub  1 FQ  1 at   0/16:40:00
> FITLD1: GETDEL: No IM entry stn  6 src   1 sub  1 FQ  1 at   0/16:40:00
> FITLD1: GETDEL: No IM entry stn  7 src   1 sub  1 FQ  1 at   0/16:40:00
>
> FITLD1: MC2CL: WARNING       404 CL RECORDS DID NOT GET CLOCK AND
> ATMOSPHERE
>
> Each scan apparently gets its own frequency ID despite entirely
> identical VEX mode/setup for all scans. Secondly 'IM' entries are
> missing, whatever that means. The third warning is about mc2cl. The
> latter is strange as well because PRTAB of the 'MC' table does show
> proper-looking atmospheric and clock delays and delay rates for all
> three frequency IDs.
>
> Might this be an issue in AIPS FITLD? Or is it an issue in difx2fits?
>
> cheers,
> Jan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Difx-users mailing list
> Difx-users at listmgr.nrao.edu
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/difx-users
>

-- 
-------------------------
Walter Brisken
Director
Long Baseline Observatory
(505)-234-5912



More information about the Difx-users mailing list