[daip] [!17215]: AIPS - Regarding OBIT and AIPS: BDFLIST and BDF2AIPS
Eric Greisen
nraohelp at nrao.edu
Fri Nov 20 16:34:49 EST 2020
Eric Greisen updated #17215
---------------------------
Regarding OBIT and AIPS: BDFLIST and BDF2AIPS
---------------------------------------------
Ticket ID: 17215
URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/17215
Name: Juhi Tiwari
Email address: j_aquarian_t at yahoo.co.in
Creator: User
Department: AIPS Data Reduction
Staff (Owner): Eric Greisen
Type: Issue
Status: Open
Priority: Default
SLA: NRAO E2E
Template group: Default
Created: 26 October 2020 08:42 AM
Updated: 20 November 2020 02:34 PM
Reply due: 24 November 2020 10:22 AM (3d 19h 48m)
Resolution due: 12 August 2023 05:00 PM (995d 2h 25m)
1. Everything you sent looks good. I would not worry much about the rms.
2. The scalar vs vector is a good test. L band phases tend to be stable as you found.
3. Everyone uses 2pt stay with it for L band.
4. The gain calibrator is a good phase calibrator (or it would not be a good gain calibrator)
5. The rms is just a measure of the deviation from the mean
6. The calibrator image looks correct. Your source has a 2nd source within the beam. The amplitudes and phases will reflect both your source's structure and that of the 2nd source. So amplitudes and phases will be a function of the location in the uv plane (calibration sources should not have this problem). Go ahead and make an image - but image a large area so as to get both sources. The LIST option actually looks pretty good.
You are worrying too much - things look good.
Eric Greisen
------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP: https://help.nrao.edu/staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20201120/b93228c7/attachment.html>
More information about the Daip
mailing list