[daip] [!16728]: AIPS - Help Explaining Phase Calibrator Plots
Eric Greisen
nraohelp at nrao.edu
Thu Aug 13 17:44:18 EDT 2020
Eric Greisen updated #16728
---------------------------
Staff (Owner): Eric Greisen (was: -- Unassigned --)
Help Explaining Phase Calibrator Plots
--------------------------------------
Ticket ID: 16728
URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/16728
Name: Gregory Walsh
Email address: gwalsh4758 at gmail.com
Creator: User
Department: AIPS Data Reduction
Staff (Owner): Eric Greisen
Type: Issue
Status: Open
Priority: Default
SLA: NRAO E2E
Template group: Default
Created: 06 August 2020 11:49 AM
Updated: 13 August 2020 02:44 PM
Reply due: 17 August 2020 01:12 PM (3d 22h 28m)
Resolution due: 02 May 2023 05:00 PM (992d 2h 15m)
I think I am confused by what Is plotted in the plots you sent. I had assumed that the "bad" one (with horns at +- 45 and 135) was every single time stamp and every single channel individually. That would be rather noisy in phase if the sources are fairly weak even if SPW averaged data are well detected. The AIPS task UVHIM will make a histogram image - you can try with real/imag and amp/phase axes. A rectangle in real/imag is what I would expect if the noise is the same in both real and imag (as it should be). RFLAG looks for specific signatures in the data (or at least the CASA version used to). If your calibrators are not point sources then some of the phase variation may also be due to their structure. Try SPFLG to look at your data in detail also. Are there systematic oddities or occasional unflagged RFI?
Just some random thoughts...
Eric Greisen
------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP: https://help.nrao.edu/staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20200813/88b5848d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Daip
mailing list