[daip] [#14344]: GC table and APCAL

[Eric Greisen]

On 7/18/19 2:51 PM, Migenes, Victor wrote:
> 
> Eric,
> 
> One more question ....
> When we reduced and calibrated this data the first time everything ran 
> pretty smoothly ...
> this time around we are getting much more grief.  May I ask another 
> favor? When we run
> ANTAB it is not reading ALL the TSYS on the file. Out of about 209 TSYS 
> entries per
> antenna, it reads:
> 
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Task ANTAB  (release of 31DEC17) begins
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 ZTXOP2: using translated file name =
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 ZTXOP2: /home/vmigenes/aips/FITS/BM132CAL.VLBA
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 ZTXOP2: using translated file name =
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 ZTXOP2: /home/vmigenes/aips/FITS/BM132CAL.VLBA
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     65 TSYS records read for station: HN
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     64 TSYS records read for station: NL
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     65 TSYS records read for station: SC
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     65 TSYS records read for station: FD
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     63 TSYS records read for station: LA
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     63 TSYS records read for station: PT
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     64 TSYS records read for station: KP
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     64 TSYS records read for station: OV
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     64 TSYS records read for station: BR
> ANTAB1 15:45:12     50 TSYS records read for station: MK
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: SC
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: NL
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: FD
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: LA
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: PT
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: KP
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: OV
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: BR
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: MK
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Gain curve read for station: HN
> ANTAB1 15:45:12      0 unidentified records skipped on input
> ANTAB1 15:45:12 Appears to have ended successfully
> 
> I have checked for obvious mistakes on line +/-10 around line 65
> but everything looks good.  Any suggestions?! I mean besides telling
> me to do something else!


Why are you using ANTAB?  VLBA stations have the data provided with the 
FITS-IDI file and ANTAB should not be required (or used).

I note that ANTAB ignores data records that it thinks do not match times 
of the current data in the NX table.  Have you gotten into more trouble 
with all the various FREQIDs you have?

Eric Greisen