[daip] [!11945]: AIPS - BPASS complains about the IFs
Mar Mezcua
nraohelp at nrao.edu
Thu May 17 09:15:38 EDT 2018
Mar Mezcua updated #11945
-------------------------
Status: Open (was: Closed)
BPASS complains about the IFs
-----------------------------
Ticket ID: 11945
URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/11945
Name: Mar Mezcua
Email address: mmezcua at iac.es
Creator: User
Department: AIPS Data Reduction
Staff (Owner): Eric Greisen
Type: Issue
Status: Open
Priority: Default
Template group: Default
Created: 19 April 2018 12:51 PM
Updated: 17 May 2018 01:15 PM
Hi again Eric,after successfully dealing with the IFs issue, I have formed the calibration and imaging of each of the two frequencies individually. Everything looks very nice, and I get a very nice detection. However, I'm puzzled by one issue: when imaging the target I get rms noises of 0.1 microJy/beam (while the predicted one for 3h on source is of ~10 microJy/beam)! How is this possible? I also find that at C-band the flux calibrator (3C279) has a flux density of 5.9599E-02 Jy, and the phase calibrator (J1330+071) of 5.4240E-04 Jy, values way lower than the tabulated fluxes.I have revisited all the steps and tables and outputs and everything seems to be correct, so I do not understand what's wrong. Any ideas??Thanks!Mar
------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP: https://help.nrao.edu/staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20180517/3202a639/attachment.html>
More information about the Daip
mailing list