[daip] [#ACK-888716]: SPLIT/SPLAT

[Eric Greisen]

Lynn D. Matthews wrote:
> Eric,
> 
> I haven't been able to access the Help Desk all morning so I'm bypassing 
> it.
> 
> Looking at this fresh, I am probably creating my own confusion. It 
> appears there is no problem so long as one always specifies CALCODE for 
> data sets where dummy scans are present for the source one wants to 
> SPLIT. Even after flagging those annoyances and applying the flag table, 
> the dummy sources remain in the source table (which I had forgotten) so 
> they can continue to cause minor irritation (as in my Case 2).
> 
> I still don't quite understand the source of the "SLCOP FOUND NO 
> SAMPLES..." for my Case 1 (where the dummy isn't flagged), but as this 
> pertains to the dummy scan and is alleviated by specifying CALCODE, it 
> is probably a non-issue.
> 
> Lynn

I still suspect the CL table in case 1 as missing any values for source 
#1.  How that happens I would not know since there should be CL entries 
for all sources that have data.  CLCAL can leave things out however if 
one uses OPCODE 'CALI' rather than CALP.

The new VLA habit of having multiple sources with the same name has 
raised the prominence of the CALCODE in particulr.  How did you set 
QUALs however - I have not seen such a use in a while.

Eric