[daip] AIPS/LION, problems with IMAGR 31DEC12 ?
Jose-Maria Torrelles
chema.torrelles at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 18:15:56 EST 2012
Dear Eric, these are the messages we are obtaining for a channel aborting after
about 1000 iterations.
Do you recognize the kind of errors at the end of IMAGR when sending
problems. As I told you, this is not happening with our computers
working in Barcelona with AIPS DEC11
Regards,
Chema
1 5 09-JAN-2012 16:15:48 IMAGR Task IMAGR (release of
31DEC12) begins
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:15:48 IMAGR Doing no flagging this time
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:48 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.IMAGR . 1 (UV) on disk 7 cno 1
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:15:48 IMAGR Beginning channel 303
through 303 with 1 IFs
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:15:48 IMAGR IMACPY: Copied
271076 visibilities to be imaged
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:48 IMAGR QINIT: did a GET of
40602 Kwords, OFF 9388529
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:48 IMAGR UVWAIT: begin finding
uniform weights
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR UVWAIT: Average grid
weight 7.072E-07
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR UVWAIT: Adding
temperance S 1.414E-07
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR UVWAIT: begin applying
uniform or other weights
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR UVWAIT: Sum of weights
in 8.736E-03 and out 1.401E-02
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR UVWAIT: Noise is
increased by a factor 1.211 due to weighting
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR UVWAIT: Average summed
weight 7.072E-07 over 271076 vis
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.IBM001. 2 (MA) on disk 6 cno 12
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.IBM002. 2 (MA) on disk 6 cno 13
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.IBM003. 2 (MA) on disk 6 cno 14
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:49 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.IBM004. 2 (MA) on disk 6 cno 15
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:51 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.ICL001. 465 (MA) on disk 6 cno 16
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:54 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.ICL002. 465 (MA) on disk 6 cno 17
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:57 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.ICL003. 465 (MA) on disk 6 cno 18
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:15:59 IMAGR Create SCHANEPOCH1
.ICL004. 465 (MA) on disk 6 cno 19
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR Making beams for
fields 1 through 4
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR GRDFLT: X and Y
convolution type = SPHEROIDAL
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR GRDFLT: X and Y parms
= 3.0000 1.0000
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR GRDFLT: convolution
function sampled every 1/100 of a cell
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR Field 1 Sum of
gridding weights = 1.48698E-01
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR Field 2 Sum of
gridding weights = 1.48698E-01
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR Field 3 Sum of
gridding weights = 1.48698E-01
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR Field 4 Sum of
gridding weights = 1.48698E-01
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR Field 1 Beam min =
-95.9 MilliJy, max = 1.0 Jy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:12 IMAGR Fit Gaussian FWHM =
516.010 x 360.570 Microarcsec, PA= -11.3
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR Field 2 Beam min =
-95.9 MilliJy, max = 1.0 Jy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR Fit Gaussian FWHM =
516.009 x 360.570 Microarcsec, PA= -11.3
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR Field 3 Beam min =
-95.9 MilliJy, max = 1.0 Jy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR Fit Gaussian FWHM =
516.010 x 360.570 Microarcsec, PA= -11.3
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR Field 4 Beam min =
-95.9 MilliJy, max = 1.0 Jy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR Fit Gaussian FWHM =
516.009 x 360.570 Microarcsec, PA= -11.3
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR CLBHIS: minimum
component 0.261 of current peak
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR QINIT: did a FREE of
40602 Kwords, OFF 9388529
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR QINIT: did a GET of
135168 Kwords, OFF 9388529
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:13 IMAGR Making images for
fields 1 through 2
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:20 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-277.0 MilliJy,max = 1.7 Jy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:25 IMAGR Field 2 min =
-127.6 MilliJy,max = 89.0 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:25 IMAGR Making images for
fields 3 through 4
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:31 IMAGR Field 3 min =
-147.1 MilliJy,max = 92.5 MilliJy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:36 IMAGR Field 4 min =
-52.6 MilliJy,max = 47.8 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 657
cell beam + residuals > 103.06 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR 19263 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= 565.786 MilliJy iter= 26
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 2.453 Jy 26 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 2.453 Jy 26 comps
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR SETDO3: imaging done
with multiple tangent planes
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR VISDFT: Model
components of type Point
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:16:49 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
mac-pro- AIPS (31DEC12) 1672 09-JAN-2012
16:22:03 Page 2
Pops Prior Date Time Task Messages for user 1672
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:55 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-142.8 MilliJy,max = 565.3 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 111
cell beam + residuals > 70.10 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR 6052 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= 185.568 MilliJy iter= 101
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 4.862 Jy 101 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 4.862 Jy 101 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:16:58 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:04 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-62.5 MilliJy,max = 182.2 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 54.45 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR 371 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= 87.601 MilliJy iter= 172
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 5.771 Jy 172 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 5.771 Jy 172 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:07 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:13 IMAGR Field 3 min =
-37.4 MilliJy,max = 39.4 MilliJy
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:14 IMAGR Doing no flagging this time
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:19 IMAGR Field 2 min =
-37.1 MilliJy,max = 37.1 MilliJy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:26 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-43.8 MilliJy,max = 87.9 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:28 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 27.38 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:29 IMAGR 4255 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:29 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= 42.531 MilliJy iter= 270
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:29 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 6.368 Jy 270 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:29 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.368 Jy 270 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:29 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:29 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:29 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:35 IMAGR Field 4 min =
-38.8 MilliJy,max = 36.1 MilliJy
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:41 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-42.8 MilliJy,max = 42.5 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 25.37 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR 5859 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= -32.476 MilliJy iter= 355
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 6.560 Jy 355 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.560 Jy 355 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:44 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:50 IMAGR Field 3 min =
-36.6 MilliJy,max = 39.8 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 25.27 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR 4452 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR Field 3 min
algorithm flux= 30.935 MilliJy iter= 89
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR Field 3 Clean flux
density= 29.859 MilliJy 89 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.590 Jy 444 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 3 - 3
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:17:53 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:17:59 IMAGR Field 4 min =
-38.8 MilliJy,max = 36.0 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 25.27 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR 3440 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR Field 4 min
algorithm flux= 30.262 MilliJy iter= 96
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR Field 4 Clean flux
density= -19.892 MilliJy 96 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.570 Jy 540 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
mac-pro- AIPS (31DEC12) 1672 09-JAN-2012
16:22:03 Page 3
Pops Prior Date Time Task Messages for user 1672
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 4 - 4
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:02 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:08 IMAGR Field 2 min =
-37.8 MilliJy,max = 34.9 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 25.13 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR 4641 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR Field 2 min
algorithm flux= 30.325 MilliJy iter= 123
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR Field 2 Clean flux
density= -14.034 MilliJy 123 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.556 Jy 663 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 2 - 2
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:11 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:18 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-41.7 MilliJy,max = 35.1 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:20 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 25.02 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:21 IMAGR 5854 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:21 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= -29.831 MilliJy iter= 495
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:21 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 6.666 Jy 495 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:21 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.662 Jy 803 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:21 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:21 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:21 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:27 IMAGR Field 3 min =
-35.6 MilliJy,max = 39.2 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:31 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.96 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:32 IMAGR 4589 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:32 IMAGR Field 3 min
algorithm flux= -29.209 MilliJy iter= 237
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:32 IMAGR Field 3 Clean flux
density= 35.186 MilliJy 237 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:32 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.667 Jy 951 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:32 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:32 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 3 - 3
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:32 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:38 IMAGR Field 2 min =
-37.8 MilliJy,max = 34.3 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:42 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.89 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:43 IMAGR 4468 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:43 IMAGR Field 2 min
algorithm flux= -28.749 MilliJy iter= 281
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:43 IMAGR Field 2 Clean flux
density= 15.920 MilliJy 281 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:43 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.697 Jy 1109 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:43 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:43 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 2 - 2
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:43 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:49 IMAGR Field 4 min =
-38.3 MilliJy,max = 34.6 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.86 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR 3941 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR Field 4 min
algorithm flux= -28.668 MilliJy iter= 279
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR Field 4 Clean flux
density= 6.076 MilliJy 279 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.723 Jy 1292 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 4 - 4
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:52 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:18:53 IMAGR Doing no flagging this time
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:18:59 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-41.2 MilliJy,max = 34.7 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:01 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.75 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:02 IMAGR 5559 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:02 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= -28.423 MilliJy iter= 701
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:02 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 6.655 Jy 701 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:02 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.712 Jy 1498 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:02 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:02 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
mac-pro- AIPS (31DEC12) 1672 09-JAN-2012
16:22:03 Page 4
Pops Prior Date Time Task Messages for user 1672
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:02 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:09 IMAGR Field 3 min =
-35.2 MilliJy,max = 38.6 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:11 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.67 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:12 IMAGR 4487 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:12 IMAGR Field 3 min
algorithm flux= -27.876 MilliJy iter= 443
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:12 IMAGR Field 3 Clean flux
density= 69.287 MilliJy 443 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:12 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.746 Jy 1704 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:12 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:12 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 3 - 3
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:12 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:18 IMAGR Field 2 min =
-37.2 MilliJy,max = 33.8 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.59 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR 4302 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR Field 2 min
algorithm flux= 27.592 MilliJy iter= 501
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR Field 2 Clean flux
density= 49.381 MilliJy 501 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.779 Jy 1924 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 2 - 2
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:21 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:28 IMAGR Field 4 min =
-38.0 MilliJy,max = 34.7 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.52 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR 4029 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR Field 4 min
algorithm flux= -27.464 MilliJy iter= 522
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR Field 4 Clean flux
density= 14.319 MilliJy 522 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.788 Jy 2167 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 4 - 4
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:31 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:38 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-40.1 MilliJy,max = 33.9 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.40 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR 5330 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= 27.290 MilliJy iter= 970
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 6.530 Jy 970 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.663 Jy 2436 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 1 - 1
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:41 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:48 IMAGR Field 3 min =
-34.5 MilliJy,max = 38.1 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.30 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR 4334 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR Field 3 min
algorithm flux= 26.775 MilliJy iter= 702
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR Field 3 Clean flux
density= 121.630 MilliJy 702 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.716 Jy 2695 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 3 - 3
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:19:51 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:19:58 IMAGR Field 2 min =
-36.3 MilliJy,max = 33.5 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.19 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR 4138 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR Field 2 min
algorithm flux= 26.560 MilliJy iter= 775
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR Field 2 Clean flux
density= 43.542 MilliJy 775 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.710 Jy 2969 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 2 - 2
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:01 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:09 IMAGR Field 4 min =
-37.5 MilliJy,max = 34.7 MilliJy
mac-pro- AIPS (31DEC12) 1672 09-JAN-2012
16:22:03 Page 5
Pops Prior Date Time Task Messages for user 1672
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:11 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 24.11 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:11 IMAGR 4163 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:12 IMAGR Field 4 min
algorithm flux= 26.434 MilliJy iter= 819
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:12 IMAGR Field 4 Clean flux
density= 17.602 MilliJy 819 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:12 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.713 Jy 3266 comps
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:12 IMAGR VISDFT: Begin DFT
component subtraction
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:12 IMAGR VISDFT: fields 4 - 4
chns 1 - 1 in 1 CC models
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:12 IMAGR I Polarization model processed
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:19 IMAGR Field 1 min =
-36.9 MilliJy,max = 33.3 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:22 IMAGR BGC Clean: using 103
cell beam + residuals > 23.97 MilliJy
1 2 09-JAN-2012 16:20:22 IMAGR 5057 Residual map
points loaded
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:22 IMAGR Field 1 min
algorithm flux= -26.228 MilliJy iter= 1289
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:22 IMAGR Field 1 Clean flux
density= 6.523 Jy 1289 comps
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:22 IMAGR Total Cleaned flux
density = 6.706 Jy 3585 comps
1 7 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR ZMI2: REQUEST FOR
BYTES 276037633 THRU = 277217280
1 7 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR ZMI2: BEYOND EOF = 276891648
1 7 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR ZMIO: OPER=WRIT LUN=20
BLKNO= 269569 8-BIT-BYTES=******
1 7 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR ZERROR: IN ZMI2 ERRNO
= 22 (Invalid argument)
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR APIO: MDISK ERROR 3 ON WRIT
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR CCSGRD: WRITE ERROR
13 GRID ROW 2116
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR OUMSUB: ERROR
SUBTRACTING CLEAN field number 0001
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR OUMSUB: FROM UVdata work object
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR UVSUBM: ERROR
SUBTRACTING CLEAN field number 0001
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR UVSUBM: FROM UVdata work object
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR CLNUV2 : ERROR
CLEANING CLEAN process object
1 8 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR CLNUV : ERROR CLEANING
CLEAN process object
1 6 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR Deleting UV work file:
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR Destroyed 1 extension
files of type AN
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR Destroyed 1 extension
files of type FQ
1 4 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR Destroyed UV image
file: catno= 1 disk= 7
1 3 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR Purports to die of
UNNATURAL causes
1 5 09-JAN-2012 16:20:31 IMAGR mac-pro- 31DEC12 TST:
Cpu= 200.5 Real= 283 IO= 65177
On 1/9/12, Jose-Maria Torrelles <chema.torrelles at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Eric, we have made some probes. We are making images of four
> fields simultaneusly with IMAGR. For our computers in Barcelona (linux
> pc, mac) using AIPS DEC11, we use NITER 5000 obtaining good images of
> the masers in the four fields. However, in Mexico, using AIPS DEC12,
> with the same number of iterations 5000, IMAGR aborts after about 1500
> iterations. This is the reason why the image looks completely
> different since it is not restoring properly. But we do not understand
> why in version DEC12 IMAGR aborts after 1500 iterations if we have the
> same data as those using AIPS DEC11 with NITER 5000 and working
> properly.
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards
>
> Chema
> On 1/6/12, Jose-Maria Torrelles <chema.torrelles at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear Eric, thank you very much. We will do more probes by this monday. At
>> moment we have checked all the input parameters from IMAGR and they are
>> coincident.
>> We will let you know.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> Chema
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> José-María Torrelles
>> Instituto de Ciencias del Espacio (CSIC)-UB/IEEC
>> DAM, Facultat de Física, Planta 7a, Universitat de Barcelona
>> C/ Martí i Franquès 1
>> 08028 Barcelona
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Eric Greisen wrote:
>>
>>> Jose-Maria Torrelles wrote:
>>>> Dear AIPS, do you know if AIPS 31DEC12 is working correctly within MAC
>>>> Lion systems?
>>>> We are producing images in two sites, Mexico and Barcelona. In
>>>> Barcelona
>>>> we have Snow Leopard working with AIPS 31DEC11 producing images
>>>> with IMAGR without any problem. However in Mexico with Lion system and
>>>> AIPS 31DEC12 we are obtaining images with completely different things.
>>>> We
>>>> know that the spectral channels we are managing
>>>> have strong signal (masers), and in fact we are mapping without any
>>>> problem those images using Snow Leopard and AIPS 31DEC11 in our mac
>>>> computer in Barcelona.
>>>> As an example, I give you what IMEAN obtains from the image produced in
>>>> Lion (same input parameters) without seeing the signal:
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Image= SCHANEPOCH1
>>>> .ICL001.
>>>> 303 1 xywind= 1 1 8192 8192
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean and rms found by
>>>> fitting peak in histogram:
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean= 5.7710E-07 Rms=
>>>> 6.0268E-03 **** from histogram
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean and rms found by
>>>> including all data:
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean=-5.956E-08 Rms=
>>>> 6.035E-03 JY/BEAM over 67108864. pixels
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Flux density =
>>>> -1.8959E-01
>>>> Jy. beam area = 21.08 pixels
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Minimum=-3.6945E-02 at
>>>> 8191 2673 1 1
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29
>>>> 24.84505451 DEC 40 11 19.2190997
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Maximum= 3.3348E-02 at
>>>> 1707 2 1 1
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29
>>>> 24.90163955 DEC 40 11 18.9520000
>>>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Skypos: IPOL 22236.429
>>>> MHZ
>>>> 1 3 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Appears to have ended
>>>> successfully
>>>>
1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN mac-pro- 31DEC12 TST:
>>>> Cpu= 3.4 Real= 6 IO= 512
>>>> However, in our computer in Barcelona with Snow Leopard 31DEC11 (and
>>>> also
>>>> PC Linux) we obtain correct things with the maser at 1.7 Jy level seen:
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:48 IMEAN Task IMEAN (release of
>>>> 31DEC11) begins
>>>> 1 3 04-JAN-2012 10:18:48 IMEAN Initial guess for PIXSTD
>>>> taken from ACTNOISE inheader
>>>> 1 3 04-JAN-2012 10:18:48 IMEAN Initial guess for PIXAVG
>>>> taken from ACTMEAN inheader
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Image= SCHANEPOCH1
>>>> .ICL001.
>>>> 303 1 xywind= 1 1 8192 8192
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean and rms found by
>>>> fitting peak in histogram:
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean= 8.5468E-07 Rms=
>>>> 5.8542E-03 **** from histogram
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean and rms found by
>>>> including all data:
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean= 2.129E-06 Rms=
>>>> 6.012E-03 JY/BEAM over 67108864. pixels
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Flux density =
>>>> 6.7766E+00
>>>> Jy. beam area = 21.08 pixels
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Minimum=-3.8377E-02 at
>>>> 8191
>>>> 2673 1 1
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29
>>>> 24.84505451 DEC 40 11 19.2190997
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Maximum= 1.7877E+00 at
>>>> 4335
>>>> 5202 1 1
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29
>>>> 24.87870534 DEC 40 11 19.4720001
>>>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Skypos: IPOL 22236.429
>>>> MHZ
>>>> 1 2 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN returns adverbs to AIPS
>>>> 1 3 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Appears to have ended
>>>> successfully
>>>> In both sites, AIPS was installed with binaries.
>>>
>>> 31DEC12 is brand new and there should be little or no difference between
>>> the 2 versions depending on when the 31DEC12 was installed (or the most
>>> recent MNJ run). I have changed some subroutines in ways that should
>>> have
>>> little or no impact on IMAGR. We have seen no difficulties whatsoever
>>> with the transition from Snow Leopard to Lion and in fact the load
>>> modules you are using on both computers are computed on a machine with
>>> an
>>> O/S not even as advanced as Snow Leopard.
>>>
>>> There are so many things that can be different between the two
>>> executions
>>> of IMAGR (and even IMEAN) that I can tell very little from this alone.
>>> One possibility would be if the IMAGR in Mexico was run with BMAJ < 0
>>> which would leave a residual image without the components restored.
>>>
>>> Try PRTCC on both machines to see if that gives similar results - an
>>> IMHEADER might also show interesting information.
>>>
>>> Eric Greisen
>>
>>
>
More information about the Daip
mailing list