[daip] AIPS/LION, problems with IMAGR 31DEC12 ?
Jose-Maria Torrelles
chema.torrelles at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 11:36:27 EST 2012
Dear Eric, thank you very much. We will do more probes by this monday. At moment we have checked all the input parameters from IMAGR and they are coincident.
We will let you know.
Best regards,
Chema
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
José-María Torrelles
Instituto de Ciencias del Espacio (CSIC)-UB/IEEC
DAM, Facultat de Física, Planta 7a, Universitat de Barcelona
C/ Martí i Franquès 1
08028 Barcelona
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Eric Greisen wrote:
> Jose-Maria Torrelles wrote:
>> Dear AIPS, do you know if AIPS 31DEC12 is working correctly within MAC Lion systems?
>> We are producing images in two sites, Mexico and Barcelona. In Barcelona we have Snow Leopard working with AIPS 31DEC11 producing images
>> with IMAGR without any problem. However in Mexico with Lion system and AIPS 31DEC12 we are obtaining images with completely different things. We know that the spectral channels we are managing
>> have strong signal (masers), and in fact we are mapping without any problem those images using Snow Leopard and AIPS 31DEC11 in our mac computer in Barcelona.
>> As an example, I give you what IMEAN obtains from the image produced in Lion (same input parameters) without seeing the signal:
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Image= SCHANEPOCH1 .ICL001. 303 1 xywind= 1 1 8192 8192
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean and rms found by fitting peak in histogram:
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean= 5.7710E-07 Rms= 6.0268E-03 **** from histogram
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean and rms found by including all data:
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Mean=-5.956E-08 Rms= 6.035E-03 JY/BEAM over 67108864. pixels
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Flux density = -1.8959E-01 Jy. beam area = 21.08 pixels
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Minimum=-3.6945E-02 at 8191 2673 1 1
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29 24.84505451 DEC 40 11 19.2190997
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Maximum= 3.3348E-02 at 1707 2 1 1
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29 24.90163955 DEC 40 11 18.9520000
>> 1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Skypos: IPOL 22236.429 MHZ
>> 1 3 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN Appears to have ended successfully
>>
1 5 03-JAN-2012 17:17:50 IMEAN mac-pro- 31DEC12 TST: Cpu= 3.4 Real= 6 IO= 512
>> However, in our computer in Barcelona with Snow Leopard 31DEC11 (and also PC Linux) we obtain correct things with the maser at 1.7 Jy level seen:
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:48 IMEAN Task IMEAN (release of 31DEC11) begins
>> 1 3 04-JAN-2012 10:18:48 IMEAN Initial guess for PIXSTD taken from ACTNOISE inheader
>> 1 3 04-JAN-2012 10:18:48 IMEAN Initial guess for PIXAVG taken from ACTMEAN inheader
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Image= SCHANEPOCH1 .ICL001. 303 1 xywind= 1 1 8192 8192
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean and rms found by fitting peak in histogram:
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean= 8.5468E-07 Rms= 5.8542E-03 **** from histogram
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean and rms found by including all data:
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Mean= 2.129E-06 Rms= 6.012E-03 JY/BEAM over 67108864. pixels
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Flux density = 6.7766E+00 Jy. beam area = 21.08 pixels
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Minimum=-3.8377E-02 at 8191 2673 1 1
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29 24.84505451 DEC 40 11 19.2190997
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Maximum= 1.7877E+00 at 4335 5202 1 1
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Skypos: RA 20 29 24.87870534 DEC 40 11 19.4720001
>> 1 5 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Skypos: IPOL 22236.429 MHZ
>> 1 2 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN returns adverbs to AIPS
>> 1 3 04-JAN-2012 10:18:52 IMEAN Appears to have ended successfully
>> In both sites, AIPS was installed with binaries.
>
> 31DEC12 is brand new and there should be little or no difference between the 2 versions depending on when the 31DEC12 was installed (or the most recent MNJ run). I have changed some subroutines in ways that should have little or no impact on IMAGR. We have seen no difficulties whatsoever with the transition from Snow Leopard to Lion and in fact the load modules you are using on both computers are computed on a machine with an O/S not even as advanced as Snow Leopard.
>
> There are so many things that can be different between the two executions of IMAGR (and even IMEAN) that I can tell very little from this alone. One possibility would be if the IMAGR in Mexico was run with BMAJ < 0 which would leave a residual image without the components restored.
>
> Try PRTCC on both machines to see if that gives similar results - an IMHEADER might also show interesting information.
>
> Eric Greisen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20120106/63d2ef94/attachment.html>
More information about the Daip
mailing list