[daip] setjy
Rob Ivison
rji at roe.ac.uk
Fri Mar 5 06:43:48 EST 2010
dear daip!
i'm sure i've missed the announcement in a midnight job report, but we
noticed today that SETJY is reporting ~0.8Jy for 3C48 at ~34GHz under
31DEC10 and ~0.6Jy under 31DEC09.
31DEC09 contains the line
graems> SETJY1: / Using (1999.2) VLA or Reynolds (1934-638)
coefficients
whilst 31DEC10 says
horn > SETJY1: / Using (2010) VLA or Reynolds (1934-638) coefficients
presumably this relates to the WMAP calibration efforts? is there an
announcement somewhere i can be directed to?
i don't understand why 31DEC09 with MNJ is reporting a different value
to 31DEC10 with MNJ?
...leaving aside the horrific magnitude of the difference :-/
cheers,
Rob
More information about the Daip
mailing list