[daip] setjy

Rob Ivison rji at roe.ac.uk
Fri Mar 5 06:43:48 EST 2010


dear daip!

i'm sure i've missed the announcement in a midnight job report, but we 
noticed today that SETJY is reporting ~0.8Jy for 3C48 at ~34GHz under 
31DEC10 and ~0.6Jy under 31DEC09.

31DEC09 contains the line

graems> SETJY1: / Using (1999.2) VLA or Reynolds (1934-638) 
coefficients

whilst 31DEC10 says

horn  > SETJY1: / Using (2010) VLA or Reynolds (1934-638) coefficients

presumably this relates to the WMAP calibration efforts? is there an 
announcement somewhere i can be directed to?

i don't understand why 31DEC09 with MNJ is reporting a different value 
to 31DEC10 with MNJ?

...leaving aside the horrific magnitude of the difference :-/

cheers,

Rob




More information about the Daip mailing list