[daip] MNJ library problem?
Robert Mutel
robert-mutel at uiowa.edu
Thu Aug 5 11:13:16 EDT 2010
Thanks all.
I think the writing on the wall is to upgrade our O/S. Since the UI
has a sweetheart deal [no cost to Dept license] with RH we will
probably upgrade to RHEL 5, although I concur with Pat that the free
Linux dists. e.g. Ubuntu are quite nice (I use Ubuntu at the Iowa
Robotic Observatory).
In the meantime I did a binary install of AIPS on my new 27in quad
core i7 iMac and it works great.
R
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Wes Young <wyoung at aoc.nrao.edu> wrote:
> Well any old libc won't work if the newer one is not backward compatible, which is likely the case here.
>
> wes
> wyoung at aoc.nrao.edu
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Eric Greisen wrote:
>
>> Robert Mutel wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> Our 31DEC10 AIPs suddenly stopped working, with the error msg:
>>>
>>> Starting up 31DEC10 AIPS with normal priority
>>> Begin the one true AIPS number 1 (release of 31DEC10) at priority = 0
>>> AIPS1: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by AIPS1)
>>>
>>> Our libc.so.6 points to glibc version 2.3.4:
>>>
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Jul 22 10:08 libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.4.so*
>>>
>>> I wonder if the large MNJ a few days ago removed support for 2.3.4?
>>>
>>> Robert
>>
>> Our system guy is perplexed about this 2.4 requirement since in fact on
>> dave (the machine that does the link edits) we have 2.5 not 2.4.
>>
>> cd $LOAD
>> ldd AIPS.EXE
>>
>> only shows libc.so.6 so one would expect any old libc to do okay. We
>> did have a compile problem in C complaining about GNU versions and one
>> with link edit with a crazy error message when we tried to use 9.0, our
>> older compiler version. But nothing explicitly about libc.
>>
>> Eric Greisen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Daip mailing list
>> Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip
>
>
More information about the Daip
mailing list