[daip] ay193
Eric Greisen
egreisen at nrao.edu
Tue Oct 27 17:40:33 EDT 2009
Data Analysts wrote:
> DAIP,
>
> Can you explain the OP, OQ, etc. ? I've dealt with the missing
> flux cal.
>
> Thanks,
> Meri
>
>
> Farhad Zadeh wrote:
>> Hi Meri,
>> Hope all is well. I have been trying to reduce AY193 but
>> I am not sure why we didn't observe 3c286 for both days of observations
>> on 28May2009 and 29May2009. Also, I am getting these names 0P, 0Q,
>> etc in the file:
>>
>> 17 17456-28599 0H: 0000 17:45:40.0400 -28:59:58.100 59536
>> 18 17456-28594 0I: 0000 17:45:40.0400 -28:59:28.100 60698
>> 19 17457-29014 : 0000 17:45:42.0400 -29:01:28.100 59826
>> Type Q to stop, just hit RETURN to continue
>>
>> townes LISTR(31DEC09) 2520 26-OCT-2009 21:53:47 Page 14
>> File = 20090529 .Q BAND. 1 Vol = 2 Userid = 2520
>> ID Source Qual Calcode RA(2000.0) Dec(2000.0) No. vis
>> 20 17457-29009 : 0000 17:45:42.0400 -29:00:58.100 60627
>> 21 17457-29004 : 0000 17:45:42.0400 -29:00:28.100 58837
>> 22 17457-28599 : 0000 17:45:42.0400 -28:59:58.100 58299
>> 23 17457-28594 : 0000 17:45:42.0400 -28:59:28.100 60477
>> 24 17457-29014 0O: 0000 17:45:44.0400 -29:01:28.100 59613
>> 25 17457-29009 0P: 0000 17:45:44.0400 -29:00:58.100 58821
>> 26 17457-29004 0Q: 0000 17:45:44.0400 -29:00:28.100 59806
>> 27 17457-28599 0R: 0000 17:45:44.0400 -28:59:58.100 58946
>> 28 17457-28594 0S: 0000 17:45:44.0400 -28:59:28.100 60190
>> 29 17456-29057 : 0000 17:45:38.1800 -29:05:43.730 57751
>>
>> Do they make sense?
>> Did we miss 3c286 in our observe file? Any help that you can provide
>> would be great. Which data should we download to get 3c286 at Q band?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Farhad
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Daip mailing list
> Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip
Meri - you must include Farhad's address or I can only reply to you
The addition of characters ti the source name is to avoid calling
sources at different positions by the same name. There is a planet
mode in FILLM to avoid this but it should not arise on sources named in
this fashion. One can see the different coordinates on sources 23
versus 28 here - the other conflicts are not included in Farhad's listing.
If you did not observe 3C286 at Q band - where instrumental gains are
rather time variable, then you are probably out of luck. Any
contemporary data re likely to be in the proprietary period anyway...
Eric Greisen
More information about the Daip
mailing list