[daip] Two curiosities from 1 Software correlator FITS file

Walter Brisken wbrisken at nrao.edu
Wed May 7 18:44:01 EDT 2008


Hi Eric,

Is this something that would have affected geodly values in CL table, or 
is it limited to the allocation of space for the data?  i.e.,would the 
"totals" been affected?

-W

On Wed, 7 May 2008, Eric Greisen wrote:

>
> I have found a logic error in FITLD - it set antup for the new antennas of a 
> sample and then decided it had to write out for the previous source - hence 
> the first record of source 7 had antenna 11 in it and so 11 was required for 
> the first file's last scan.  I moved the antup setting to after the CL 
> writing.  Note that this also meant that an antenna could be missed from a 
> scan if it occurred only in the first record of that scan.
>
> Eric
>




More information about the Daip mailing list