[daip] problem

[Eric Greisen]

Patrick Palmer writes:
 > Eric,
 > 
 > I have a messed up situation.  On one disk that I reconstituted with 
 > REBYTE, I discovered that most of the files did not have a header.  They 
 > are in the catalog but there is no data.  The other disk is fine.  I 
 > assumed that I had done something wrong, so I deleted things on the new 
 > disk and redid rebyte.  However, the result is the same as before.
 > 
 > On the original disk, I have:
 > aips at oskar$ ls -l /AIPS/o_AIPS/DATA/OSKAR_4 | grep UV
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff   40214528 2007-10-13 15:12 UVD001001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff  219441152 2007-10-13 15:20 UVD002001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff 3210778624 2007-10-13 16:57 UVD003001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-10-15 10:38 UVD004001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-10-15 10:39 UVD005001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-10-15 10:40 UVD006001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-10-15 10:41 UVD007001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-10-15 10:42 UVD008001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff      13312 2007-10-15 10:43 UVD009001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-01 10:34 UVD00A001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-05 14:07 UVD00B001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-07 11:14 UVD00C001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-08 11:03 UVD00D001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-09 10:01 UVD00E001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-12 14:54 UVD00F001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-15 11:18 UVD00G001.09N;
 > -rw-rw-r--  1 aips staff       5120 2007-11-29 10:32 UVD00H001.09N;
 > 

        it would help to see 

ls -l /AIPS/o_AIPS/DATA/OSKAR_4/CB*.09N*
ls -l /AIPS/o_AIPS/DATA/OSKAR_4/??D002*.09N*


 > REBYT1: Start copying CB cno   2 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying UV cno   2 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying HI cno   2 ver   1 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   1 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   2 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   3 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   4 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   5 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   6 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   7 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   8 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying CL cno   2 ver   9 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying NX cno   2 ver   1 for user  347
 > REBYT1: Start copying IM cno   2 ver   1 for user  347

 I need to figure out if it is done with cno 2 and why no CB 3 even if
the large UV data set is a problem.  But it should not be - we count
in kilobytes and there are "only" 3 million of them.

Eric