[daip] 31DEC08 LINUX midnite job (dave, 20080213.044457)
aipsmgr at nrao.edu
aipsmgr at nrao.edu
Tue Feb 12 23:45:16 EST 2008
dave update report for 31DEC08 on Wed Feb 13 04:45:16 UTC 2008 (UT)
Copies and compiles:
AIPSUPD - Using CVS for copying files.
UPDCVS - cvs copy of 31DEC08 begun, 1st character means
- U added, P updated, M your file differs from master
- C you have a changed file needing work (error!)
- ? you have a file not on the master (ignore)
U 31DEC08/TIMESTAMP
P 31DEC08/APL/PGM/NOTST/RMSD.FOR
P 31DEC08/HIST/CHANGE.DOC
P 31DEC08/UPDATE/COMLNK.UPD
U 31DEC08/UPDATE/COMLNK.UPD.SUM
U 31DEC08/UPDATE/LASTCVS.DAT
P 31DEC08/UPDATE/PUTBCK.UPD
U 31DEC08/UPDATE/PUTBCK.UPD.SUM
P 31DEC08/UPDATE/REASONS.UPD
U 31DEC08/UPDATE/REASONS.UPD.SUM
P 31DEC08/UPDATE/WHATISOUT.UPD
U 31DEC08/UPDATE/WHATISOUT.UPD.SUM
UPDCVS - cvs update of 31DEC08 completed
UPDCVS - cvs update of TEXT completed
AIPSUPD - UPDCVS apparently worked
UPDCONTROL - /home/AIPS/31DEC08/LINUX/UPDATE/LASTREMOVE.DAT = 20080212.044318
UPDCONTROL - /home/AIPS/31DEC08/LINUX/UPDATE/LASTCOPY.DAT = 20080212.044318
UPDCONTROL - /home/AIPS/31DEC08/LINUX/UPDATE/LASTCOMRPL.DAT = 20080212.044318
UPDCONTROL - /home/AIPS/31DEC08/LINUX/UPDATE/LASTCOMLNK.DAT = 20080212.044318
UPDCONTROL - Everything seems in order
UPDCOMRPL: COMRPLs
UPDCOMRPL: currently in /home/AIPS/31DEC08/LINUX/UPDATE
UPDCOMLNK: COMLNKs
12-FEB-2008 18:20:23 20080212 TST APGNOT RMSD.FOR lkogan
UPDCOMLNK: currently in /home/AIPS/31DEC08/LINUX/UPDATE
UPDCOMLNK: /home/AIPS/31DEC08/APL/PGM/NOTST/RMSD.FOR
UPDCONTROL - Reasons for file updates on Wed Feb 13 04:45:10 UTC 2008 (UT)
12-FEB-2008 18:19:50 20080212 TST APGNOT RMSD.FOR more change to the last version
12-FEB-2008 18:36:05 20080212 TST HIST CHANGE.DOC RMSD: more change
CHANGE.DOC entries:
12562. February 12, 2008 RMSD Leonia
The double precision version of the Least square routine
has been attached to the RMSD to control
"matrix is inconsistent..". Now the solution for SIGMA is
zeroed if it happens. That allows to circumwent bad solutions
which can occur at the case of bad data (more zeros for
example). The least square solution is considered bad under
the following new condition: IF(SIGMA.LE.0 .OR. MAXIMU.LE.2).
The previos condition IF(SIGMA.LE.1.E-7) may create a problem
if the data consist mainly of the very small numbers.
So the new version can more succesfully fight with the very
special data: many zeros, histogram is two far from a
Gaussian....
Moved nowhere.
12563. February
More information about the Daip
mailing list