[daip] Spectral Index maps
Amy Mioduszewski
amiodusz at nrao.edu
Fri Oct 26 11:16:03 EDT 2007
O.K., you've hit on a major pet peeve of mine. In order to make a realistic
spectral index map you should not "taper and convolved the data to the same
beam" you should put a model for the image for the lower frequency through the
uv coverage of the higher frequency (and then convolve the beam to the lower
frequency). Yes, uv coverage matters and make a big difference. Simply
convolving the data to the same beam misses the fact that you have fewer short
spacings at the higher frequency, therefore you miss flux that might be there
and *artificially* have a more negative spectral index than is real. This is
particularly important for VLBI arrays that are relatively sparsely populated.
Anyway, I can give you detailed instructions on how to do this if you want.
Amy
Mercedes Esteves Filho wrote:
>
> Hi. Ive data from the VLBA and would like to construct
> spectral index maps. Now Ive tapered and convolved the
> data to the same beam. Image size and increment are the
> same for both images. So added and divided images using COMB
> look ok, but the spectral index maps dont look ok.
>
> I guess that this will have to do with my choices
> for aparm and bparm...But could you help me
> out with this?
>
> Mercedes Filho
>
> ******************************************************
> * *
> * Mercedes Esteves Filho, Ph.D. *
> * Centro de Astrofisica da Universidade do Porto *
> * Rua das Estrelas *
> * 4150 - 762 Porto *
> * Portugal *
> * email: mfilho at astro.up.pt *
> * Tel: +351 22 6089 853 *
> * Fax: +351 22 6089 831 *
> * *
> ******************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Daip mailing list
> Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip
>
More information about the Daip
mailing list