[daip] CRSFRING
Amy Mioduszewski
amiodusz at nrao.edu
Fri Aug 17 11:21:03 EDT 2007
Hi Matt,
You should e-mail daip at nrao.edu in case Eric is away.
I have been corresponding with someone else about this problem, we have tracked
this down to something in BLAVG, but he isn't very responsive so that is as far
as we got. Could you look at your BLAVG output and tell me if it has any valid
data in it?
Thanks,
Amy
> ------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Return-Path: <mlister at physics.purdue.edu>
> Received: from polaris.cv.nrao.edu (polaris.cv.nrao.edu [192.33.115.101])
> by dropbox.aoc.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/smtp-gateway) with ESMTP id l7HCviK8026250
> for <egreisen at aoc.nrao.edu>; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:57:44 -0600
> Received: from cv3.cv.nrao.edu (cv3.cv.nrao.edu [192.33.115.2])
> by polaris.cv.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/smtp-gateway) with ESMTP id l7HCviTM021602
> for <egreisen at nrao.edu>; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:57:44 -0400
> Received: from mailhub128.itcs.purdue.edu (mailhub128.itcs.purdue.edu [128.210.5.128])
> by cv3.cv.nrao.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/cv-ws-8.12) with ESMTP id l7HCvTQU008224
> for <egreisen at nrao.edu>; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:57:39 -0400
> Received: from prospero.physics.purdue.edu (prospero.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.204])
> by mailhub128.itcs.purdue.edu (8.13.7/8.13.7/smtp.purdue.edu) with ESMTP id l7HCvTIQ032380
> for <egreisen at nrao.edu>; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:57:29 -0400
> Message-ID: <46C59B39.1000905 at physics.purdue.edu>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)
> X-PMX-Version: 5.2.1.279297
> X-PerlMx-Virus-Scanned: Yes
> X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster at cv.nrao.edu for more information
> X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0,
> required 5, autolearn=disabled)
> X-MailScanner-From: mlister at physics.purdue.edu
> X-Spam-Status: No
> From: Matthew L Lister <mlister at physics.purdue.edu>
> To: Eric Greisen <egreisen at nrao.edu>
> Subject: CRSFRING errors
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:57:29 -0400
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I'm having troubles with the 31DEC06 version of CRSFRING - has it been
> patched in the 31DEC07 release?
> (ie. would running the MNJ help? I've tried VLBACPOL in 31DEC06, and it
> crashes as well)
> The same task on the same dataset works fine on 31DEC05, but chokes on
> 31DEC06. Here are the task inputs:
>
> - - Matt
>
> >inp
> AIPS 1: CRSFRING: Procedure to calibrate cross pol. delays
> AIPS 1: Adverbs Values Comments
> AIPS 1: ----------------------------------------------------------------
> AIPS 1: Use RUN CRSFRING first
> AIPS 1: INNAME 'BL149AD' UV file name (name)
> AIPS 1: INCLASS 'UVDATA' UV file name (class)
> AIPS 1: INSEQ 1 UV file name (seq. #)
> AIPS 1: INDISK 9 UV file disk drive #
> AIPS 1: OUTDISK 9 Disk for temporary files
> AIPS 1: FLAGVER 1 Flag table to use
> AIPS 1: GAINUSE 5 Calibration table to use
> AIPS 1: NO DEFAULT
> AIPS 1: SUBARRAY 1 Selected subarray
> AIPS 1: ANTENNAS *all 0 List of antennas, 0->use all
> AIPS 1: REFANT 2 Reference antenna
> AIPS 1: CALSOUR *all ' ' Calibrator sources to use.
> AIPS 1: See note in HELP file!
> AIPS 1: TIMERANG 0 11 Time range
> AIPS 1: 46 54 0 11
> AIPS 1: 53 24
> AIPS 1: SOLINT 0 Pre-averaging interval (min)
> AIPS 1: BADDISK *all 0 Disk drive #'s to avoid
>
>
> Here's the results of 31DEC05:
>
> prospe> BLAVG1: Task BLAVG (release of 31DEC05) begins
> prospe> BLAVG1: You are using a non-standard program
> prospe> BLAVG1: OUTPUT BASELINE 1 - 2
> prospe> BLAVG1: Create CROSSPOL TMP.BLAVG . 666 (UV) on disk 9 cno 12
> prospe> BLAVG1: BLAVDO: NO. OF PARAMETERS 10 NOT NORMAL - AVG MAY BE BAD
> prospe> BLAVG1: BLAVDO: 8 Visibility records written
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied OB file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied WX file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied FQ file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied AN file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied SU file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Appears to have ended successfully
> prospe> BLAVG1: prospero 31DEC05 TST: Cpu= 9.6 Real= 51
> prospe> INDXR1: Task INDXR (release of 31DEC05) begins
> prospe> INDXR1: Appears to have ended successfully
> prospe> INDXR1: prospero 31DEC05 TST: Cpu= 0.1 Real= 1
> prospe> FRING1: Task FRING (release of 31DEC05) begins
> prospe> FRING1: You are using a non-standard program
> prospe> FRING1: WARNING: Input int. time (DPARM(4)) is greater than
> prospe> FRING1: than that found in the data. Please be aware
> prospe> FRING1: that this can cause odd errors.
> prospe> FRING1: Selecting the data
> prospe> FRING1: Dividing data by source flux densities
> prospe> FRING1: Determining solutions
> prospe> FRING1: Writing SN table 1
> prospe> FRING1: Time= 0/ 11 50 05, Polarization = 1
> prospe> FRING1: Time= 0/ 11 50 05, Polarization = 2
> prospe> FRING1: Found 16 good solutions
> prospe> FRING1: Appears to have ended successfully
> prospe> FRING1: prospero 31DEC05 TST: Cpu= 0.0 Real= 0
> prospe> POLSN1: Task POLSN (release of 31DEC05) begins
> prospe> POLSN1: Appears to have ended successfully
> prospe> POLSN1: prospero 31DEC05 TST: Cpu= 0.0 Real= 0
> prospe> TACOP1: Task TACOP (release of 31DEC05) begins
> prospe> TACOP1: Copied SN file from vol/cno/vers 9 12 2 to 9 10 7
> prospe> TACOP1: TACOP / Copied 1 extension files
> prospe> TACOP1: Appears to have ended successfully
> prospe> TACOP1: prospero 31DEC05 TST: Cpu= 0.0 Real= 0
>
>
> And here are the results of 31DEC06, using the same inputs as before:
> prospe> BLAVG1: Task BLAVG (release of 31DEC06) begins
> prospe> BLAVG1: You are using a non-standard program
> prospe> BLAVG1: OUTPUT BASELINE 1 - 2
> prospe> BLAVG1: Create CROSSPOL TMP.BLAVG . 666 (UV) on disk 9 cno 12
> prospe> BLAVG1: BLAVDO: NO. OF PARAMETERS 10 NOT NORMAL - AVG MAY BE BAD
> prospe> BLAVG1: BLAVDO: 8 Visibility records written
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied OB file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied WX file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied FQ file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied AN file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Copied SU file from vol/cno/vers 9 10 1 to 9 12 1
> prospe> BLAVG1: Appears to have ended successfully
> prospe> BLAVG1: prospero 31DEC06 TST: Cpu= 8.8 Real= 43
> prospe> INDXR1: Task INDXR (release of 31DEC06) begins
> prospe> INDXR1: Appears to have ended successfully
> prospe> INDXR1: prospero 31DEC06 TST: Cpu= 0.0 Real= 0
> prospe> FRING1: Task FRING (release of 31DEC06) begins
> prospe> FRING1: You are using a non-standard program
> prospe> FRING1: WARNING: Input int. time (DPARM(4)) is greater than
> prospe> FRING1: than that found in the data. Please be aware
> prospe> FRING1: that this can cause odd errors.
> prospe> FRING1: Selecting the data
> prospe> FRING1: Dividing data by source flux densities
> prospe> FRING1: Determining solutions
> prospe> FRING1: Writing SN table 1
> prospe> FRING1: Time= 0/ 11 50 05, Polarization = 1
> prospe> FRING1: Time= 0/ 11 50 05, Polarization = 2
> prospe> FRING1: ERROR: NO VALID SOLUTIONS FOUND
> prospe> FRING1: Purports to die of UNNATURAL causes
> prospe> FRING1: prospero 31DEC06 TST: Cpu= 0.0 Real= 0
>
> ------- end -------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Daip mailing list
> Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip
>
More information about the Daip
mailing list