[daip] KNTR
Robert Laing
rlaing at eso.org
Mon Nov 27 19:30:31 EST 2006
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Eric Greisen wrote:
> I think you sent daip a message about KNTR. The MailMan system is
> messing things up, causing approved messages to disappear in some way
> or other. Can you resend the message to me directly?
>
> Sorry,
>
Dear Eric
I was wondering why daip had refused to post my message quoting "no
reason".
Here it is:
Dear Eric et al.
I think that there is an inconsistency between the polarization vector
information printed out by KNTR and what is actually plotted for the case
in
which the pol line length for a pixel is given
The two attached plots are for KNTR with the same set of input images for
ltype
= 3 and 4. The pixel size is 0.05 arcsec:
The two attached plots are for KNTR with the same set of input images for
ltype
= 3 and 4. The pixel size is 0.05 arcsec:
AIPS 1: Image=SS433 (MA) Filename=SS433 SC7 .I 0.4 . 1
AIPS 1: Telescope=VLA Receiver=VLA
AIPS 1: Observer=AF403 User #= 5
AIPS 1: Observ. date=11-JUL-2003 Map date=17-NOV-2006
AIPS 1: Minimum=-7.57716261E-05 Maximum= 3.25772434E-01 JY/BEAM
AIPS 1: ----------------------------------------------------------------
AIPS 1: Type Pixels Coord value at Pixel Coord incr Rotat
AIPS 1: RA---SIN 1024 19 11 49.563 512.00 -0.050000 0.00
AIPS 1: DEC--SIN 1024 04 58 57.783 513.00 0.050000 0.00
AIPS 1: FREQ 1 4.8601000E+09 1.00 1.0000000E+08 0.00
AIPS 1: STOKES 1 1.0000000E+00 1.00 1.0000000E+00 0.00
AIPS 1: ----------------------------------------------------------------
AIPS 1: Coordinate equinox 2000.00
AIPS 1: Map type=NORMAL Number of iterations= 3459
AIPS 1: Conv size= 0.40000 X 0.40000 Position angle= 0.00
AIPS 1: Observed RA 19 11 49.566 DEC 04 58 57.84
AIPS 1: Phase shifted in X -0.051 in Y -0.057
AIPS 1: Rest freq 0.000 Vel type: OPTICAL wrt YOU
AIPS 1: Alt ref. value 0.00000E+00 wrt pixel 1.00
AIPS 1: Maximum version number of extension files of type CC is 1
AIPS 1: Maximum version number of extension files of type HI is 1
AIPS 1: Maximum version number of extension files of type PL is 6
AIPS 1: Keyword = 'WTNOISE ' value = 1.206694E+00
AIPS 1: Keyword = 'CCFLUX ' value = 5.098795E-01
AIPS 1: Keyword = 'CCTOTAL ' value = 5.098795E-01
AIPS 1: Keyword = 'PARANGLE' value = 7.517672E+00
AIPS 1: Keyword = 'ZENANGLE' value = 2.937325E+01
and factor = 10.
ltype = 3 gives 1 arcsec = 1 Jy/beam (actually a ratio in this case)
4 1 pixel = 0.1 Jy/beam, or
1 arcsec = 2 Jy/beam
I believe that the scaling from arcsec to vector length for ltype = 3 is
correct
(there are no vectors with ratio > 0.9 in the ratio image), although I
would
have expected factor = 10 to give 1 pixel = 0.1 Jy/beam from the
documentation. pcntr gives the scaling in arcsec for both ltypes,
consistent
with ltype = 3 for kntr.
In the code for kntr (and similarly for pcntr), there is the segment:
C polarization
IF (PI.GT.0) THEN
CALL GPOS (X0, Y0, IWBUFF, IRET)
IF (IRET.NE.0) GO TO 980
CALL H2CHR (8, 1, PCATH(KHBUN,PI), CHTMP)
VECTOR = 1.0 / FACTOR
WRITE (SPRTXT(1),1050) VECTOR, CHTMP
C Arc seconds instead
IF ((AXTYP(LOCNUM).EQ.1) .AND. (PCATR(KRCIC,PI).NE.0.0)
* .AND. (PCATR(KRCIC+1,PI).NE.0.0)) THEN
TEMP = MAX (ABS(PCATR(KRCIC,PI)), ABS(PCATR(KRCIC+1,PI)))
* * 3600.0
VECTOR = VECTOR / (2.0 * TEMP)
IF (TEMP.GT.0.01) THEN
WRITE (SPRTXT,1051) VECTOR, CHTMP
ELSE
VECTOR = VECTOR / 1000.0
WRITE (SPRTXT,1052) VECTOR, CHTMP
END IF
END IF
INCHAR = ITRIM (SPRTXT(1))
CALL GCHAR (INCHAR, IANGL, DCX, DCY, SPRTXT(1), IWBUFF,
* IRET)
I wonder whether the factor of 2 in
VECTOR = VECTOR / (2.0 * TEMP)
is responsible for the difference?
Regards
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: LTYP3.PS
Type: application/postscript
Size: 13315 bytes
Desc: Plott with ltype = 3
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20061128/9e8f2cde/attachment.ai>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: LTYP4.PS
Type: application/postscript
Size: 14148 bytes
Desc: Plot with LTYPE = 4
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20061128/9e8f2cde/attachment-0001.ai>
More information about the Daip
mailing list