[daip] QUACK

[Leonia Kogan]

Jim,

How many scans do you have at AJ329?

If it is not so many, you can use UVFLG several times now.

UVFLG has the standard pair ANTENNA, BASELINE

Leonia

 
Jim Ulvestad wrote:

>Is it useful for QUACK to have an option to flag by baselines
>rather than only by antennas?  See snippet below from my
>EVLA test message today.
>
>Brief data report from AJ329
>=============================
>AJ329 was observed Wednesday morning, for 1.5 hours,
>at about 1230 to 1400 UTC.  It was the simplest sort
>of observation, all X band default continuum, 50 MHz
>bandwidth, with no frequency or band changes.  Default
>frequencies were 8435 and 8485 MHz.  Three
>EVLA antennas were used -- 13, 14, and 16.
>10-second integrations were used.  The target source was
>a weak source of a mJy or yes, with a 2.3 Jy point source
>calibrator also observed every 10 minutes or so.
>
>(1) All EVLA-EVLA baselines appeared to be bad for the
>first 10-second records of each scan.  QUACK appears to have
>an option only for flagging data by antenna and not by baseline,
>so antennas 13, 14, and 16 were flagged completely for the first
>record of each scan.  The values in these records typically
>are low by about 20%, but not at zero.
>
>[...]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Daip mailing list
>Daip at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/daip
>  
>