[daip] buglet in FILLM?

[Claire Chandler]

Oh, I see.  So I should not have expected them to be put into separate 
files at all then?

Claire

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Eric Greisen wrote:

> Claire Chandler writes:
>
> > I observed in continuum mode "3030" with different frequencies for IFs AC
> > and BD (one was at 43.115297 GHz, the other at 43.214900 GHz).  I loaded
> > the data using FILLM with default CPARMs (so that the data should have
> > been filled into 2 separate files) but they were loaded into one, and
> > moreover, the header was appropriate for IFs AC only (bandwidth code "3",
> > 6.25 MHz bandwidth).  I found mention of the 50 MHz bandwidth IFs (BD)
> > only in the FQ table.
> >
> > Is the help file for FILLM wrong when it says the FQ tol is 100 kHz for
> > continuum data, CPARM(7)=0?
> >
>
> Are these not 2 IFs that are at different frequencies which is a
> pretty normal situation.  The FQ tol is for separate scans at
> different frequencies for the AC and/or the BD.
>
> ERic Greisen
>