[daip] Problem with 31DEC05 IMAGR with CMETHOD ''
Subhashis Roy
roy at astron.nl
Wed Dec 14 15:04:22 EST 2005
Hi,
It appears that with CMETHOD '', the present algorithm (07DEC05) is not correct to
choose the fastest method when IMSIZE=128i. It is not selecting GRID at
all in this case (It appears to be fine when IMSIZE=256).
(this run is on i386 compiled with gcc-2.95.3).
These are 3 cases during one run of IMAGR with 12 fields and IMSIZE=128
for each field.
----------------------
localh> IMAGR1: Resuming Clean with 8563 filtered components
localh> IMAGR1: VISDFT: Begin DFT component subtraction
localh> IMAGR1: I Polarization model processed
localh> IMAGR1: Field 1 min = -15.3 MilliJy,max = 20.2 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 2 min = -10.6 MilliJy,max = 10.6 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 3 min = -15.5 MilliJy,max = 13.6 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 4 min = -20.9 MilliJy,max = 15.4 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 5 min = -17.9 MilliJy,max = 13.9 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 6 min = -12.2 MilliJy,max = 12.2 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 7 min = -7.8 MilliJy,max = 10.0 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 8 min = -5.9 MilliJy,max = 7.9 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: Field 9 min = -12.6 MilliJy,max =
.....
--------------------------------------------------------
ocalh> IMAGR1: BGC Clean: using 89 cell beam + residuals > 2.83 MilliJy
localh> IMAGR1: 3208 Residual map points loaded
localh> IMAGR1: Field 11 min algorithm flux= 3.616 MilliJy iter=3510
localh> IMAGR1: Field 11 Clean flux density= 1.355 Jy 3510 comps
localh> IMAGR1: Total Cleaned flux density = 5.581 Jy 11200 comps
localh> IMAGR1: VISDFT: Begin DFT component subtraction
localh> IMAGR1: I Polarization model processed
------------------------------------------------------------
localh> IMAGR1: Removing 10270 remaining components from initial data
localh> IMAGR1: VISDFT: Begin DFT component subtraction
localh> IMAGR1: I Polarization model processed
-------------------------
This is making it extremely slow (last step of removing ~10000 comp took
15 minutes) on my amd64 2.2GHz machine (~3.2 GHz P-IV). Clearly, FFT is
much faster here.
Thanks.
Subhashis
More information about the Daip
mailing list