[daip] Re: uvcon

[Leonia Kogan]

Something is still wrong with your model.
The model you sent me earlier has 8839 arcsec > 2 degree increment
and 1024 pixels. So the size of the model is >2000 degrees.

Do you use the same model?

You have to learn your model using AIPS before complaining of UVCON.

Try see the image of your model using KNTR for example. You should see 
your sun with labeling of the axes. 

Right now I see  your sun using KNTR but no labeling because the strange 
image size taken from the header of your image.

Leonid Kogan
----- Begin Included Message -----

>From alara at cspsw6.gsfc.nasa.gov Tue Jan 20 10:47 MST 2004
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:47:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Alejandro Lara <alara at cspsw6.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: Alejandro Lara <alara at cspsw6.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: uvcon
To: lkogan at zia.aoc.nrao.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-MD5: sPVd9w6REUuIFD/hEyAvPQ==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.6_06 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc 
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster at aoc.nrao.edu for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.6, required 7,
	BAYES_20 -2.60, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.97)
X-Lines: 66
Status: RO

Dear Leonia Kogan,
I have solved some problems whith my model image, but I still have some other 
problems.

One question:
Why I have this message:

cspsw6> UVCON1: ALGSTB: Pass   1;  512-   0 Cells, with   174636 Pts
cspsw6> UVCON1: *******************************************************
cspsw6> UVCON1: ALGSTB:    174636 POINTS FLAGGED FOR BEING OFF THE GRID
cspsw6> UVCON1: *******************************************************

This is the whole data set (174636 POINTS)??

Thanks in advance

Alejandro Lara

>Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:04:48 -0700 (MST)
>From: Leonia Kogan <lkogan at aoc.nrao.edu>
>To: alara at cspsw6.gsfc.nasa.gov
>Subject: Re: uvcon
>Cc: daip at bonito.aoc.nrao.edu
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster at aoc.nrao.edu for more 
information
>X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.5, required 7, 
BAYES_10 -4.70, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 1.25, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.97)
>
>
>You requested Minimum hour angle (APARM(4)=18hour)
> and Maximum hour angle =0!
>That is not good.
>
>CMETHOD should be 'GRID'
>
>I ran UVCON with your infile and your model simulating snapshot observation 
>APAR(4)=-0.001, APARM(5) = 0.001 APARM(7) = 100
>
>I have not got the same error message you got.
>
>Instead UVCON complains very reasonably:
>
>UVCON1: ROTFND: CAN'T FIND PROPER AXIS TYPE FOR MAP ROTATION
>UVCON1: UNKNOWN CLEAN MAP STOKES TYPE =   0
>UVCON1: Destroyed  1 extension files of type AN
>UVCON1: Destroyed UV image file: catno=     50 disk= 3
>UVCON1: Purports to die of UNNATURAL causes
>UVCON1: bonito       31DEC04 TST: Cpu=       9.6  Real=      25
>
>>UVCON1: ROTFND: CAN'T FIND PROPER AXIS TYPE FOR MAP ROTATION
>
>The list of the coordinate axis at image header of the model image 
>does not include (in UVCON) 'solar-we', 'solar-no' which are used at 
>your model.
>
>>UVCON1: UNKNOWN CLEAN MAP STOKES TYPE =   0
>
>Stokes axis is required
>
>The attached file includes 
>1.the message I got at the end of UVCON run
>2.Image header of your model 
>3.Image header of the model typically used for UVCON



----- End Included Message -----