[daip] Re: UVFIX problem
Eric Greisen
egreisen at nrao.edu
Fri Feb 27 13:24:38 EST 2004
Phil Edwards writes:
> I'm helping a student reduce some archival VSOP data, and he seems to have
> run into a problem. In his first reduction we found the delays and rates
> were changing very rapidly on ground baselines, and checks revealed the
> data was correlated with quite a large offset from the VCS position now
> available: ~450 mas in RA and ~150 mas in dec(!). He corrected this in
> uvfix and things looked good... except all the HALCA data disappeared!
> Closer checkign of the uvfix parameters revealed uvfixprm(16), for
> orbiting antennas. We assumed this should be 1, for HALCA, but have also
> trialled 3, as three separate tracking stations are used for the HALCA
> data in this observation. In both cases, though, UVFIX dies ("of unnatural
> causes") with the message CMPUVW: UVWCAL ERROR 1. We tried reducing the
> offset by a factor of 10 in ra and dec, on the off chance the relatively
> large offset was the problem, but got the same message. He's using
> the 31dec02 version of AIPS.
>
> Are we missing a step somewhere? Do we need to run obtab?
> Or whatever task links the three tracking station names together?
> Is uvfixprm(1)=1 the correct value?
>
> Any help you can provide would be most welcome. Please let us know if you
> need any further details from us -- or would like the data to inspect
> yourself.
>
Looking at the code - UVFIXP(16) must equal the antenna number of the
orbiting antenna - run PRTAB to see what that is and try it. UVFIX is
a difficult task and I am unfamiliar with the orditing aspects of it,
but the rest has received work. 31DEC02 is getting a bit long in the
tooth however.
Eric Greisen
More information about the Daip
mailing list